This is a printer friendly version of the page you were just visiting.
Click here to return to original page format.
Click here to return to original page format.
Programs & Projects
The Institute is a catalyst for advancing a comprehensive national literacy agenda.
LINCS Resource Collections
Program Management
Assessment
Products/Materials
Title: Illuminating Understanding: Performance Assessment in Mathematics
Author: Tricia Donovan
Institutional affiliation/Agency/Program: Adventures in Assessment
Publication date or date of most recent update: Spring 2002
Number of pages: 4
Type of product: Description of practice: the author describes the use of performance assessment in an ABE math setting.
Key words:
performance assessment, mathematics, selected response, performance task, rubrics
Target: Instructors
Skill levels of instructional materials (lessons, curricula):
ABE Beginning Literacy (NRS Educational Functioning Level 1)
ABE Beginning Basic Education (NRS Educational Functioning Level 2)
ABE Intermediate Low (NRS Educational Functioning Level 3)
ABE Intermediate High (NRS Educational Functioning Level 4)
ASE Low (NRS Educational Functioning Level 5)
ASE High (NRS Educational Functioning Level 6)
High Beginning ESL (NRS Educational Functioning Level 3)
Low Intermediate ESL (NRS Educational Functioning Level 4)
High Intermediate ESL (NRS Educational Functioning Level 5)
Advanced ESL Literacy (NRS Educational Functioning Level 6)
ABE Beginning Literacy (NRS Educational Functioning Level 1)
ABE Beginning Basic Education (NRS Educational Functioning Level 2)
ABE Intermediate Low (NRS Educational Functioning Level 3)
ABE Intermediate High (NRS Educational Functioning Level 4)
ASE Low (NRS Educational Functioning Level 5)
ASE High (NRS Educational Functioning Level 6)
High Beginning ESL (NRS Educational Functioning Level 3)
Low Intermediate ESL (NRS Educational Functioning Level 4)
High Intermediate ESL (NRS Educational Functioning Level 5)
Advanced ESL Literacy (NRS Educational Functioning Level 6)
Training required:
The article can be used in training to help practitioners learn how to incorporate performance assessment in math classes. The subject matter described needs some practice in order for the practitioner to become comfortable with the methodology.
Abstract:
The author describes what performance assessment is in the context of teaching math to adult learners. She argues that this type of assessment is most appropriate for working with math content because too often, math is tested by selected response (i.e.: multiple choice tests) resulting in either the right or wrong answer, which does not allow students to demonstrate their process. This in turn causes the instructor to have a difficult time understanding where the student needs to focus more effort. The author discusses what constitutes a 'good performance task' and provides several examples of these, along with a discussion and examples of using rubrics to accompany the performance task.
What the experts say:
The resource highlights how performance tasks (as opposed to selected response items) can help a teacher gain insight into the math processes of students. The paper presents a good overview of the concept of performance assessment but is weak on the specifics of implementation into the classroom. More explicit examples of performance tasks, custom-created rubrics, and actual student work that is scored using the rubric would greatly help a teacher see how the information in the article can be applied to the classroom. Links to pre-existing Web-based resources on math performance tasks and rubrics could help the teacher actually see how performance assessment could work in a classroom. It can also help the teacher to better understand his/her role when utilizing performance-based assessments.
This is a smart article. It's clear that Donovan understands performance assessment. It's a little more prescriptive than I would like, but that is not a bad thing at all for practitioners. Instructors will like the rubric, even though there is isn't much explanation of how to use it.
This is a smart article. It's clear that Donovan understands performance assessment. It's a little more prescriptive than I would like, but that is not a bad thing at all for practitioners. Instructors will like the rubric, even though there is isn't much explanation of how to use it.
Last updated: Thursday, 24-Sep-2009 13:55:38 EDT




