[NIFL-4EFF:1106] Re: Goal-setting (again?)

From: Andy Nash (andy_nash@jsi.com)
Date: Sat Jul 15 2000 - 00:52:33 EDT


Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id e6F4qXZ25811; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 00:52:33 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 00:52:33 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <s96fb510.088@jsi.com>
Errors-To: listowner@nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-4eff@nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-4eff@nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Andy Nash" <andy_nash@jsi.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-4EFF:1106] Re: Goal-setting (again?)
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2
Status: O
Content-Length: 1552
Lines: 28

Hello,

I wonder if there are any folks who would be willing to talk about
their work with group goal-setting or group discussion of individual
goals.  Most of our discussions about goal-setting have focused on an
individualized process (teacher or counsellor sitting with students to
identify, refine, or assess goals). This doesn't resonate with my own
experience of identifying goals (for myself). I need to talk with
others, hear what their goals are, and consider possibilities I never
thought of. I know that whenever a workshop opens with a go-round of
what we want to get out of the session (our "goals"), I've revised my
goal three times by the time we get around the circle. Perhaps I'm
just impressionable(!), but I believe that sharing and discussing what
we're seeking - and why - is key to getting at a more-than-superficial
vision. I am always challenged to think more reflectively when I
compare my own purposes with those of others. This is different from
getting affirmation or a reality check from a supportive listener,
which feels good and helps me with practicality but doesn't help me
consider the full set of options I really have. I am concerned that
our strategies focus adults on setting "realistic" and achievable
goals before they've had a chance to explore their larger purposes,
and that we don't provide enough space for them to analyze the forces
(social policy, family expectation, etc.) that are influencing their
goals. Are these conversations happening somewhere?

Thanks, 
Andy Nash
NELRC/World Education
EFF staff



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 29 2001 - 15:04:13 EST