Return-Path: <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f9JLqn016525; Fri, 19 Oct 2001 17:52:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 17:52:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <107.749c753.2901fa4c@aol.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: AndresMuro@aol.com To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-4EFF:1849] Re: What does a transparent approach mean? X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Status: O Content-Length: 790 Lines: 31 clear, uderstandable. Ironic, that they try to use this metaphor to signify clarity aand the metaphor itself is not understood. I, hate it. I don't know why people don'y just say clear. Andres In a message dated Fri, 19 Oct 2001 4:09:02 PM Eastern Daylight Time, "Spacone, Ronna (Contractor)" <Ronna.Spacone@ed.gov> writes: > Here's a question that a subscriber with temporary technical difficulties > asked me post: > > I am interested in different ways people could explain the use of > the word "transparent" as used in the EFF framework. If someone saw > "purposeful and transparent approach to education" and asked, "What > does transparent mean?" what would you say? > > Ronna > > Ronna G. Spacone > NIFL-4EFF Moderator > Ronna.Spacone@ed.gov > > > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Apr 09 2002 - 13:30:20 EDT