[NIFL-4EFF:1901] State Plans

From: ssargent@steckvaughn.com
Date: Tue Nov 06 2001 - 13:03:22 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id fA6I3M018456; Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:03:22 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:03:22 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <OF5A3C9BEF.9593D1AE-ON86256AFC.0061332D@harcourtbrace.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: ssargent@steckvaughn.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-4EFF:1901] State Plans
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.6a  January 17, 2001
Status: O
Content-Length: 295
Lines: 9


I know that the states of Maine and Washington have adopted the EFF Content
Framework. Have any other states adopted it? Are any in the process of
adoption? Are there any other ways that the EFF Framework is driving change
in state policies or systems?

Many thanks in advance,
Sharon Sargent



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Apr 09 2002 - 13:30:24 EDT