Return-Path: <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id fA7Agq025268; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 05:42:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 05:42:52 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <fc.002dc802015734b33b9aca0060b3a2bb.15734d6@onf.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: "Rob Wood" <Rob_Wood@onf.com> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-4EFF:1911] Re: State Plans X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Status: O Content-Length: 714 Lines: 18 nifl-4eff@nifl.gov writes: > >You will, no doubt, hear from the EFF National Center in response to your >question because at my last count, 27 states have adopted all or some >portion >of the EFF Framework as the basis for system reform in their states. Thank you for clarifying that many states have "adopted EFF" in different manners. I have talked to some states where the adoption for evenstart programs have been great while adoption for more general programs have been bumpy. I happen to hail from Maine which has established (mandated has a different tone) that EFF be used for all Adult Basic Education Programs. Many of us are trying but the universality is complicated. Rob Wood Portland Maine
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Apr 09 2002 - 13:30:25 EDT