Return-Path: <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id fA7EVA027057; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 09:31:10 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 09:31:10 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <E1039FD8A2E0D311BDAD00508B9566E105B4A75A@odeexc02.ode.state.oh.us> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: "Zengler, Cynthia" <Cynthia.Zengler@ode.state.oh.us> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-4EFF:1912] RE: State Plans X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Type: text/plain; X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Status: O Content-Length: 749 Lines: 23 Ohio has also adopted the EFF framework. We are using it in all aspects of our programing. We have general trainings throughtout the state and use an EFF approach to the PD system. We have incorporated the EFF language into our grants as well. -----Original Message----- From: ssargent@steckvaughn.com [mailto:ssargent@steckvaughn.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 1:03 PM To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: [NIFL-4EFF:1901] State Plans I know that the states of Maine and Washington have adopted the EFF Content Framework. Have any other states adopted it? Are any in the process of adoption? Are there any other ways that the EFF Framework is driving change in state policies or systems? Many thanks in advance, Sharon Sargent
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Apr 09 2002 - 13:30:25 EDT