[NIFL-4EFF:2227] Performance Assessments for Adult Education: Exploring the Measur

From: Spacone, Ronna (Contractor) (Ronna.Spacone@ed.gov)
Date: Fri Sep 27 2002 - 15:48:48 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g8RJmmX28164; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:48:48 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:48:48 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <5DCA49BDD2B0D41186CE00508B6BEBD00B725546@wdcrobexc01.ed.gov>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Spacone, Ronna (Contractor)" <Ronna.Spacone@ed.gov>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-4EFF:2227] Performance Assessments for Adult Education: Exploring the Measur
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55)
Status: O
Content-Length: 1276
Lines: 27

This report has been added to the Manager/Administrator Literacy Resources
section in the EFF Special Collection, located at:
http://www.nifl.gov/lincs/collections/eff/manager.html --

Performance Assessments for Adult Education: Exploring the Measurement
Issues
Report of a Workshop, 2002 http://www.nap.edu/books/0309084539/html/ 

Jointly commissioned by the National Institute for Literacy and the Office
of Vocational and Adult Education, this report was designed to provide both
agencies with background information on how to set quality guidelines for
alternative assessments. While the explicit focus of the study is Quality
Standards for Performance Assessment, the report provides clear and useful
information about quality criteria for all assessments used for both
formative (teaching and learning) and summative (reporting) purposes. It
also examines particular challenges of assessment in adult education,
including challenges to validity that arise due to: 1) the relative
insensitivity of the reporting scales of the NRS to small gains; 2)
difficulties in interpreting gain scores; and 3) difficulties in comparing
assessments across programs and states, due to the lack of a common content
framework. 



Ronna Spacone
NIFL-4EFF List Moderator
(202) 233-8767



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:45:30 EST