[NIFL-4EFF:2230] Re: Act Now: Preserve NIFL's Adult Ed Focus - Remember the

From: Jeanette Baldridge (ginet_b@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Sep 28 2002 - 12:19:55 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g8SGJtX22138; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 12:19:55 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 12:19:55 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <F83Sc8BUUnTQerqE3OC000095c2@hotmail.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Jeanette Baldridge" <ginet_b@hotmail.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-4EFF:2230] Re: Act Now: Preserve NIFL's Adult Ed Focus - Remember the
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Status: O
Content-Length: 7111
Lines: 178

Emails were sent this a.m.

This list has been so silent, I have wondered whether it is still active. 
Does this mean that all EFF problems have been solved?

Jeanette



>From: "Spacone, Ronna (Contractor)" <Ronna.Spacone@ed.gov>
>Reply-To: nifl-4eff@nifl.gov
>To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
>Subject: [NIFL-4EFF:2226] Act Now:  Preserve NIFL's Adult Ed Focus  - 
>Remember the Communit
>Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 13:42:02 -0400 (EDT)
>
>NIFL-4EFF Colleagues:
>
>As far as I know, fewer than ten subscribers of this list responded to
>message [NIFL-4EFF:2221] FW: NLA Urgent Action: Help Preserve NIFL's Adult
>Ed Focus. What, or who are you waiting for? Please email, fax, or call your
>congress people - now - about preserving the adult education focus of the
>National Institute for Literacy (NIFL). Continued support for projects like
>Equipped for the Future (EFF) could hang in the balance. More legislators
>are needed to cosign the recommendation letter to the Secretaries of Labor,
>HHS, and Education, who will decide on the new permanent director of NIFL.
>The House letter recommends that the permanent director of NIFL be an
>individual knows the adult literacy field well. Our congress people must
>agree to sign the recommendation letter by Sept. 30th, so now is the time
>for us to help. Check the following web site:
>http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/Our for your Congress people's contact
>information. Send copies of your letter(s) to the three Secretaries too. I
>think all the other information you need to carry out this activity is
>posted below. Please also email me [Ronna.Spacone@ed.gov] with a note about
>which legislators you contacted.
>
>Thanks for your support,
>
>Ronna
>
>Ronna Spacone
>NIFL-4EFF Moderator
>
>
>#  #  #  #
>
>
>September 27, 2002
>
>The Honorable [full name of your Congressperson]
>U.S. House of Representatives
>Washington, DC  20515
>
>Dear Mr. or Ms. [your Congressperson's last name] :
>
>Please help ensure that the unique mandate of the National Institute for
>Literacy is preserved as a new director is selected.
>
>As you may know the President has nominated an entirely new slate of
>Advisory Board members. These new board members have impressive
>qualifications in early childhood education and post-secondary education.
>However, as a group their expertise in the area of adult education and
>literacy is very limited.
>
>One of the first duties of the new Advisory Board will be to forward
>recommendations for a new director to the Secretaries of Education, Labor
>and HHS. As members of the Interagency Group responsible for the
>administration of the Institute, the Secretaries will be asked to approve
>the selection of the agency's director.
>
>I feel it is critical that the new permanent director of the Institute have
>adult education and literacy expertise in order to direct the only agency
>charged with serving as national resource for adult education and literacy
>programs like mine.
>
>Therefore I urge you to co-sign a "Dear Colleague letter" to Secretaries
>Paige, Thompson, and Chao. The letter is being circulated by the office of
>Representatives Thomas Sawyer (Amy Boyle, LA) and James Walsh (Martha
>Carmen, LA).
>
>Thank you for helping us.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>[Your name]
>[The address from which you are registered to vote] (to show you are a
>constituent of his/her district)
>
>CC:	The Honorable Elaine Chao, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor
>	The Honorable Roderick Paige, Secretary, U.S. Department of
>Education
>	The Honorable Tommy G. Thompson, Secretary, U.S. Department of
>Health and Human Services
>
>#  #  #  #
>
>Please send a copy of your letter to each of the following people. By
>receiving a copy of your letter, these officials will see just how many
>people care about this issue.
>
>The Honorable Elaine Chao, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor
>Attn: Emily Stover DeRocco, Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training
>Administration
>200 Constitution Avenue NW, Room S-2307
>Washington, D.C. 20210
>
>The Honorable Roderick Paige, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education
>Attn: Beth Ann Bryan, Senior Advisor to the Secretary
>400 Maryland Avenue, S.W., Room 7W205
>Washington, D.C. 20202
>
>The Honorable Tommy G. Thompson, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and
>Human Services
>Attn: Wade F. Horn, Assistant Secretary For Children & Families
>370 L'Enfant Promenade, S.W., Suite 600
>Washington, DC 20447
>
>
>Here is the text of the House of Representatives' NIFL Letter of
>Recommendation...
>
>Draft Letter to Secretaries Paige, Thompson, and Chao:
>
>Dear Secretary __________:
>
>As a member of the Interagency Group responsible for the administration of
>the National Institute for Literacy, you will be asked to approve the
>selection of the Institute's new Director.
>
>This process will begin in the near future, after the National Institute 
>for
>Literacy's Advisory Board is installed and recommends a new Director.  The
>nominees to this Advisory Board have impressive qualifications in early
>childhood and post-secondary education.  However, as a group, their
>expertise in the area of adult education and literacy is limited.
>Therefore, we believe that it is important for the Director to possess such
>knowledge and experience.
>
>As mandated in Title II of the Workforce Investment Act, the National
>Institute for Literacy serves as national resource for adult education and
>literacy programs.  Recently, the Institute has taken on additional
>responsibilities to advance reading research and dissemination at all 
>levels
>from early childhood to adult.  The National Institute for Literacy has a
>unique mandate to foster and encourage collaboration among literacy-related
>activities that contribute to the missions of the Departments of Labor,
>Health and Human Services, and Education and its offices of pre-K-12,
>post-secondary, adult, and vocational education.  In addition, the 
>Institute
>is a primary information source to Congress about literacy and language
>need, current services, and impact.
>Consequently, we believe that there are several qualities that the National
>Institute for Literacy's Director should possess, including being:
>* conversant in adult education issues, research, and the diverse array of
>providers that comprise the delivery system;
>* passionate about building an adult learning system that integrates
>services;
>* knowledgeable of the variety of models and collaborative arrangements; 
>and
>* articulate in describing how adult literacy and language education
>enhances pre-K-12, post-secondary, and vocational education, job training,
>health care, welfare reform, economic development, and post-prison success.
>We request that you include these guidelines in any criteria you use to
>examine the recommendation of the Advisory Board for the hiring of the new
>Director for the National Institute for Literacy.
>
>
>Sincerely,
>
>#   #   #




_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:45:30 EST