[NIFL-4EFF:2389] Cross post/Father's Day

From: MWPotts2001@aol.com
Date: Mon Jun 16 2003 - 12:58:31 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id h5GGwVC09876; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:58:31 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:58:31 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <38.3a37fa10.2c1f4fba@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: MWPotts2001@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-4EFF:2389] Cross post/Father's Day
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Mac sub 39
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Status: O
Content-Length: 7942
Lines: 145

This is a cross post from the AAACE List.  Father's Day by Tom Sticht
Quite long and very interesting.  You may want to print for later reading.


Note the relationship of the last paragraph to the philosophy of EFF. What 
matters most when we are teaching reading to adults is an emphasis upon the 
interests of the adults (hence our focus on goal setting) and an understanding of 
the factors underlying their desire for learning (embedding practice in the 
Teaching/Learning Cycle).

Meta Potts, Moderator 4-EFF List
FOCUS on Literacy
Glen Allen, VA

Two "Fathers of Adult Literacy Education" in the United States
Tom Sticht


The year 2003 marks the 135th anniversary of the birth of J. Duncan Spaeth
(1868-1954) and the 105th anniversary of the birth of Paul A. Witty
(1898-1976). Born 30 years apart, these two men are nonetheless united in
the history of adult literacy education by the common thread of the world
wars of the 20th century. Spaeth worked at teaching literacy to soldiers
during World War I and Witty did similar work during World War II. But
while united by war's calling to teach adults to read, Spaeth and Witty
were widely separated not only by time but also by their beliefs about the
teaching of reading. Spaeth was an early advocate of a "code emphasis" in
teaching reading, and Witty was a strong advocate for the "meaning
emphasis" approach to teaching reading.  Both made pioneering
contributions to the field of adult literacy education.

J. Duncan Spaeth (1868-1954)

During World War I, John Duncan Spaeth, a native of Philadelphia with a
Ph. D. in early Anglo-Saxon literature from the University of Leipzig,,
took time away from his position as Professor of English at Princeton
University and worked as Educational Director of the Young Men's Christian
Association (YMCA) at Camp Wheeler, Georgia and Camp Jackson, South
Carolina. Because large numbers of men being called for military service
were illiterate, or of very limited literacy, schooling in reading and
writing became a necessary element of military training.

In 1918, the Southwestern Department of the National War Work Department
of the YMCA in Atlanta, Georgia published the "Camp Reader for
American Soldiers," written by Spaeth. A revised edition was published in
1919. In the preface to the 1918 edition of these instructional books
Spaeth devoted just three paragraphs to introducing the principles
underlying the lessons and explained that, "The "Camp Reader for American
Soldiers" is more than a mere reader. It combines exercises in reading,
writing, phonics, and spelling in each lesson. The essence of the method
here advocated lies in the simultaneous acquisition of the ability to read
words, to recognize and differentiate articulate sounds and sound groups,
to associate them with visual symbols, and to write these symbols. The
three types of association must go hand in hand, and it is therefore
essential that in each hour part of the time be devoted to reading, part
to phonic drill, and part to exercises in writing."

In the 1919 revision of the Camp Reader, Spaeth expanded his discussion of
the instructional principles of the lessons from three paragraphs to six
pages. In these pages, he produced what appear to be the first teacher
training materials for adult literacy educators that discussed
relationships among the four communication processes of listening,
speaking, reading, and writing and he provided an explanation of the
phonetic system of reading (phonics) and its relevance to writing. 
Throughout the book, extensive footnotes further instruct the teacher in
the teaching of phonics, and extensive drills are provided on decoding
lists of words.  In this book, Spaeth showed clearly that he was a
proponent of the methods of teaching reading and writing that rely heavily
upon the understanding of the written language as a substitution code for
the spoken language, and he advised considerable attention to the teaching
of the decoding and encoding of the written language through phonics.


Paul A. Witty (1898-1976).


During World War II the armed services once again faced the need to
utilize hundreds of thousands of men who were illiterate or poorly
literate. Paul Andrew Witty, with an M.A. (1923) and  Ph. D. (1931) from
Columbia University in Psychology, specialized in understanding the
process of learning to read and in developing methods for helping students
who were having difficulties in learning to read. With this background, he
was called upon to serve as an education officer in the War Department.

In May of 1943 the War Department published TM 21-500, entitled the "Army
Reader." In this book, which was produced under Witty's direction,
soldiers in the Army's Special Training Units for literacy instruction
were introduced to Private Pete, a fictional fellow member of a Special
Training Unit who was also learning reading, writing, and arithmetic. The
idea was that soldier's would be able to identify with Private Pete and
understand what they were reading about him because they shared common
experiences, such as living in the camp, sleeping in the barracks, eating
in the mess hall, and so forth. These were all things that Private Pete
did in the Army Reader. Witty was apparently the first to use this
approach of trying to motivate adults learning to read by providing a
fictional counterpart with whom they could identify.

Witty's approach reflected the influence of William S. Gray, one of the
founders of the famous Dick and Jane series for children, which provided a
model for Witty's use of Private Pete in the Army Reader, and Arthur I.
Gates, a leading reading professor at Columbia University. Both of these
men were advocates of the "meaning emphasis" approach known as the "word"
method. In this method students first develop readiness to read by
discussing illustrations from the readers. Then they learn a basic store
of sight words used in the readiness training. Then they move on to simple
sentences made up of the sight words. In this approach, phonics
instruction is postponed until the student can do quite a bit of reading
based upon discussion and whole word recognition training.

In the Private Pete program, the teacher's guide of some 26 pages never
goes into the teaching of phonics. Indeed, in Samuel Goldberg's (1951)
book, Army Training of Illiterates in World War II, it is reported that,
against advice, some of the teachers were making "…excessive use of
phonics in teaching word recognition and pronunciation." This was followed
by a list of "unfortunate results" resulting from the over use of phonics
against instructions to teach phonics only sparingly.


Positive Outcomes From the World War Literacy Education

Among the major outcomes of the teaching of illiterates in World Wars I
and II was the repeated demonstration that hundreds of thousands of adults
who many thought were not capable of learning to read, or learning much of
anything else for that matter, were, in fact, capable of acquiring at
least rudimentary reading ability in a fairly brief time, generally less
than three months.  Furthermore most of them went on to learn and perform
their Army duties in a satisfactory manner.

There may also be lessons here regarding the so-called "code emphasis" or
"meaning emphasis" approaches to teaching adults to read. Bridging the
"great wars" and the gap between the different approaches of Spaeth and
Witty, was the motivation that soldiers had to learn to read and write
letters from and to distant loved ones, and the functional nature of the
material, relating as it did to the daily lives and needs of soldiers This
may have rendered both emphases about equally useful. For adult educators,
the main lesson may be that what makes the most difference in teaching
reading with adults is an emphasis upon the interests of the adults and an
understanding of the factors underlying their desire for learning.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:14:41 EST