[NIFL-4EFF:2441] Re: Syntax

From: AWilder106@aol.com
Date: Sun Jul 20 2003 - 09:43:39 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id h6KDhd702453; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 09:43:39 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 09:43:39 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3EB8B50E.21FF14E0.0A349A3F@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: AWilder106@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-4EFF:2441] Re: Syntax
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0
Status: O
Content-Length: 661
Lines: 11

Andres.

This is brief.

Chomsky knows zip about speech and language evolution, he is a linguist and spends his time on grammar.  I am interested in teaching adults (he isn't) and in what language is.  So with some other types  of researchers I have  come down to syntax.

Language/speech are interactive, developing through human interaction.  The capacity for speech is innate, but if a person doesn't hear language by 7 years it won't develop.

Piaget was interested in the development of "scientific" thinking, you know, holding one thing constant and manipulating the variables.  Look at all his observations and experiments and you will see this.

Andrea



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:14:42 EST