[NIFL-4EFF:2630] motivation to learn

From: MWPotts2001@aol.com
Date: Sat Dec 20 2003 - 12:40:21 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id hBKHeLm29819; Sat, 20 Dec 2003 12:40:21 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 12:40:21 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <74.3685db83.2d15e24a@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: MWPotts2001@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-4EFF:2630] motivation to learn
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Mac sub 39
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Status: O
Content-Length: 2892
Lines: 57

Colleagues,

Again, I find that excerpts from PEN Weekly Newsblast (December 20, 2003) are 
closely connected to our work with EFF.  You will see in the excerpt below 
the references to motivation to learn, alienation, and disengagement, factors 
that lead students to the high school exit ramp.  

Then, these students come to us, months or years later.  What do we have to 
offer them that differs from their previous experience? 

Perhaps it is recognition of the Four Purposes for learning, identified early 
in the EFF research process.  It may be that the impersonal places the 
students encountered in high school have become very personal spaces, where student 
goals receive attention via the Role Maps and the Teaching/Learning Cycle.  

It may be that EFF is making a stronger and more explicit link between 
assessment and instruction -- purposeful instruction, in which students know what is 
expected, instruction that will improve student learning and increase test 
scores.  

I keep hearing stories about motivated adult students, and I wonder . . .




REPORT EXAMINES MOTIVATION AMONG STUDENTS
A report unveiled by the National Research Council last week paints a grim
picture of high schools unlikely to surprise teachers and students, but
argues that those schools can learn from an array of promising changes
taking root across the nation. Drawing on years of research in psychology,
education, and sociology, "Engaging Schools: Fostering High School
Students' Motivation to Learn" shows that by the time many students reach 
high school, they often lack any sense of purpose or real connection with what 
they are doing in the classroom, reports John Gehring. Although the best high 
schools are filled with well-qualified and caring teachers in a setting where 
all students are valued, the book-length report says, for too many teenagers, 
high school has become an impersonal place where low expectations are common. 
Teachers, administrators, policymakers, and the wider community are encouraged 
to think more creatively about how school settings and instruction can be tail
ored to address that sense of alienation. The problem, the analysis says, is 
even more acute in large
urban schools, where many students come from low-income families. "When 
students from advantaged backgrounds become disengaged, they may learn less than 
they could, but they usually get by or they get second chances; most eventually 
graduate and move on to other opportunities," the report's executive summary 
says. "In contrast, when students from disadvantaged backgrounds in 
high-poverty, urban high schools become disengaged, they are less likely to graduate and 
consequently face severely limited opportunities."
http://www.edweek.org/ew/ewstory.cfm?slug=15HighSchool.h23


All the Best,

Meta Potts, Moderator 4-EFF List
FOCUS on Literacy
Glen Allen, VA
mwpotts2001@aol.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:14:48 EST