[NIFL-4EFF:2939] Re: Components of Performance

From: MWPotts2001@aol.com
Date: Thu Mar 24 2005 - 09:15:48 EST 

Return-Path: <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j2OEFmG22368; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:15:48 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:15:48 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <1d8.39ac436b.2f74253e@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: MWPotts2001@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-4EFF:2939] Re: Components of Performance
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5036
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Status: O
Content-Length: 315
Lines: 8

Thanks, Andy, for the explanation of the word *register* in the performance 
of the Listening Standard.  I remember discussions of *tone* also in reference 
to the word, register, and wonder whether that is assumed in the conventions.

Thanks for your wisdom.  Good question from George.

Meta Potts
Glen Allen, VA

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:20 EST