[NIFL-4EFF:2980] Re: EFF terms, etc

From: Amy R. Trawick (atrawick@charter.net)
Date: Sat Apr 16 2005 - 17:57:41 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j3GLvfG22554; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 17:57:41 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 17:57:41 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <009601c542cf$0b0704c0$3002a8c0@ben2ut66kkx7o3>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Amy R. Trawick" <atrawick@charter.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-4EFF:2980] Re: EFF terms, etc
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
Status: O
Content-Length: 5388
Lines: 90

Andrea, Re: the issue of so many tools, so many terms--I think you're right 
on that experience with the EFF Famework is a key ingredient to building a 
deep understanding of how different pieces work together.  However, it is 
only recently that I gave up trying to experience all the pieces of the 
framework!  It's just too much.  What helped me was something that I heard 
Sondra Stein say a couple of years ago:  that the various components of the 
EFF Framework were developed as part of the Research & Development process 
on the way to identifying content standards.  They turned into teaching 
tools when teachers in the field were validating different aspects of the 
framework for research purposes and reported that the pieces were useful in 
designing and implementing meaningful, adult-oriented instruction.

The process went something like this (this is an open invitation to critique 
my understanding of the development process!):

1.  Pre-EFF, NIFL was asked by Congress to measure progress towards National 
Education Goal #6.

2.  Goal 6 talks about adults having the knowledge and skills necessary to 
be literate, compete in a global economy, and exercise the rights and 
responsibilities of citizenship.  But what does this mean?  What ARE the 
knowledge and skills adults need to know and be able to do in order to be 
literate, compete in a global economy, and exercise the rights and 
responsbilitites of cititzenship?  Before we can measure progress we have to 
know what to measure.  SO, NIFL collected essays from learners, analyzed 
them, and arrived at the 4 PURPOSES FOR LEARNING in the 3 ROLES that seemed 
to motivate adults to attend literacy and ABE programs. A vision for the 
adult literacy and lifelong learning was born--one which focused on adult 
needs and aspirations rather than (just) high school completion. (NOTE:  I 
would say an understanding of the Purposes for Learning and the 3 adult 
roles is key to "doing" EFF).

3.  Great.  We have a vision.  But we still don't know what the knowledge 
and skills are that adults need to achieve the four purposes in their three 
principal adult roles.  What to do?  Well, we need to know what adult 
responsibilities are in these 3 roles and *then* see what knowledge and 
skills they use to accomplish these responsibilities.  Through an involved 
and multi-faceted research process, the 3 ROLE MAPS were constructed.  I 
think it's important to remember that these were meant to be *descriptive* 
of the responsbilitities that adults have, not *prescriptive".  They were 
constructed in order to inform the next step in the research process, i.e., 
identifying the knowledge and skills adults use to perform these 
responsibilities.  However, in EFF's commitment to engaging the students and 
practitioners throughout the research process, one overwhelming response was 
that the Role Maps were useful in the classroom.  Thus, the Role Maps--and 
their corresponding materials--became *one* set of tools made available for 
classroom use.  (NOTE:  The use of the Role Maps is not "required" to "do" 
EFF).

4.  The next part of the R&D process was looking across roles and developing 
a sense of the common activities that occurred across roles.   When these 13 
COMMON ACTIVITIES were shared with the field for validation purposes, again 
teachers found them helpful in organizing meaningful activities.  Thus, the 
Common Activities--and corresponding materials-- became *one* set of tools 
made available for classroom use.  (NOTE:  The use of the Common Activities 
is not "required" to "do" EFF).

5.  NOW we're ready to identify the skills adults need to do these 
activities.  Thus, through more R&D, the Generative Skills are identified 
and then developed into CONTENT STANDARDS.  Now we know, through a 
consensus-building process involving individuals and groups from all walks 
in life, the skills adults need to fulfill their purposes for learning in 
their adult roles.  The research question is answered. (NOTE:  The use of 
the EFF Content Standards--specifically, teaching the components of the 
standard--"is" required to "do" EFF).

Whew!  Whenever I review this process, I understand again why it took close 
to 10 years just to get to this point.  But my point in giving my recounting 
of the history is primarily to highlight what I didn't "get" for a long 
time--that the components of the EFF Framework 1) were developed as a way of 
getting answers to an involved research question, 2)  were developed as 
descriptions of different aspects of adult activity, and  3) were coopted by 
teachers in the field who were hungry for ways to engage students in 
conversation and activities related to their lives.  What I think happened 
is that, as more and more tools came along, teachers began to think they had 
to use *all* of them to be an "EFF teacher."  I agree with others who have 
said this just isn't the case.  To me, the basics of being an EFF teacher 
are to 1) teach the EFF Content Standards 2) through approaches that build 
expertise by being purposeful, transparent, contextualized, and 
assessment-based.  The EFF TEACHING & LEARNING CYCLE, with embedded use of 
role maps and/or common activities, can help us do that, but, golly, there 
just might be other tools that teachers can use:).

Amy

Amy R. Trawick
North Wilkesboro, NC
atrawick@charter.net 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:21 EST