[NIFL-AALPD:109] Re: process & positionality

From: AWilder106@aol.com
Date: Fri Apr 04 2003 - 14:37:59 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id h34JbxU26665; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 14:37:59 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 14:37:59 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <75236807.053B721C.0A349A3F@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: AWilder106@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-AALPD:109] Re: process & positionality
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0
Status: O
Content-Length: 540
Lines: 8

Colleagues,


Let me give a business school example.  In a course on consulting the instructor made the CEO in the case a male and the consultant a female. This had not happened before.  Until that point I had assumed the crossing-gender-problem was not a problem.  Guess what--as soon as the consultant was a woman I became deeply invoved in the case, studying her manoeuvres, choices, thinking.  I wondered how she had become a consultant, how she had done it.

Andres's example jogged my memory of what I knew but had forgotten.

Andrea



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:15:00 EST