Return-Path: <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id h3OEU0U03176; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 10:30:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 10:30:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3EDD7DF4@webmail.utk.edu> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: jataylor <jataylor@utk.edu> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-AALPD:253] RE: 10 principle of improving reading (for adults too?) X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas X-Mailer: WebMail (Hydra) SMTP v3.61.08 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Status: O Content-Length: 994 Lines: 20 Good morning, Tom, All, Tom, Like George, David, and perhaps others, I find myself wondering what your intentions are. Even remembering back to a converstation on positionality, I recall your *changing* the subject to phonics when Rick asked you his very important question as to why you believe issues of sexuality are not related to adult literacy. It seems you keep pulling us back to phonics, without sharing as to why, or what your experiences/interests in professional development have been in providing phonics training as PD. Without providing insights into your experience and purpose here, one may be left to assume something that is not altogether true, and I, for one, do not want to do that. Perhaps if you shared a little more about yourself & your professional experiences, Tom, we, as a group, could collaborate in constructing a new understanding of reading theory and PD practice. Are you open to that option? Best, Jackie Taylor NIFL-AALPD List Facilitator
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:15:06 EST