[NIFL-AALPD:317] RE: Which list?

From: AndresMuro@aol.com
Date: Thu May 01 2003 - 13:55:55 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id h41HttU22417; Thu, 1 May 2003 13:55:55 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 13:55:55 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <005507E7.017FC47C.0AB94E44@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: AndresMuro@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-AALPD:317] RE: Which list?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0
Status: O
Content-Length: 5108
Lines: 117

Contrary to the NLA, this listserve appears to be focusing on practice. I have been focusing on questions about practice.

Andres

In a message dated 5/1/2003 9:49:52 AM Eastern Standard Time, "Debbie Yoho" <dwyoho@earthlink.net> writes:

>
>(I am cross-posting this question to the two lists mentioned as well as to
>NIFL moderators because I don't know who can answer this question and on
>which list I may find an answer).
> 
>I have a question about the AALPD list and the AACE-NLA list. I have been
>subscribing to both. I get almost no messages on the NLA LIST, but I notice
>several well-known NLAers (Muro, Eckert, Demetrion, etc.) are posting often
>to the AALPD list, and usually about what I would call advocacy issues.
>With the end of NIFL NLA, I'm confused now why the NLA dialog does not seem
>to have materialized on the AACE NLA. Is this just my perception? More to
>the point, where should I be looking for policy discussion? I'd like to
>unsubscribe to AALPD but am afraid I will miss information, especially
>about what is going on in the states. (I rely on the NCL list now for
>national info and alerts, and hope and trust that dialog is kept current.)
> 
>Deborah W. Yoho
>Co-moderator, NIFL-Health Listserv
>President, SC Adult Literacy Educators
>Executive Director, Greater Columbia Literacy Council
>2728 Devine Street,  Columbia, SC  29205
>803-765-2555   Fax  803-779-8417   dwyoho@earthlink.net
>
>
>> [Original Message]
>> From: George E. Demetrion <sophocles5@juno.com>
>> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov>
>> Date: 5/1/2003 8:10:59 AM
>> Subject: [NIFL-AALPD:304] Response to Sherry
>>
>> Dear Dr. Royce:
>>
>> There is absolutely nothing preventing you and others from initiating the
>> discussions you would like to have.  The beauty of listserv discussions
>> is that they enable many discussions to flourish simultaneously. Several
>> of have made an argument as to why the current threads are relevant to
>> this list.  What we haven't seen is anything remotely resembling a
>> point-by-point counterargument.  Nor have the issues which have
>> stimulated this current thread been addressed.
>>
>> Politics are being played out at many levels on the open airwaves and
>> behind the scenes of forces shaping what is and what isn't viewed as
>> publicity legitimate.  What's being discussed here has everything to do
>> with professional development.  I'm more than a little concerned about
>> efforts to marginalize this discussion by sending us off to the
>> hinterlands.  The point is not our capacity to have private discussion
>> among ourselves, but public discussion about issues that matter on the
>> open airwaves. 
>>
>> Why are so many people hostile to that?  Just change the subject, but
>> please don't inhibit us for pursuing these matters, which are being
>> thrust upon us by various political forces stemming from current DC
>> policy perspectives.  If this is all about defining reality (and make no
>> mistake, it is), then I vote for a healthy pluralism even amidst
>> conflicting perspectives then a passive conformity to a broadly-based
>> given political "reality" where other voices are marginalized or
>> repressed.  In all seriousness, how about you.  Professional development,
>> itself, is impaired in a political culture that seeks to colonize the
>> field of public legitimacy.
>>
>> With respect (and I mean that)
>> George Demetrion
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 1 May 2003 08:38:49 -0400 (EDT) Sherry Royce/C
>> <sjroyce@comcast.net> writes:
>> >Andres:
>> >I recently recommended this list to my professional development
>> >colleagues in Pennsylvania in the hopes that it would deal with ABLE
>> >teachers and trainers' best practices and research related to them.  I
>> >find that it has become a rehash of the NLA list which addressed
>> >political and philosophical issues with the same correspondents who 
>> >have>apparently more time than practitioners to state their views. That
>> was
>> >the intent of that list and accepted as such. 
>> >
>> >I do not find those discussions appropriate for this listserv and as 
>> >the>number of resignations indicate a waste of time for professional
>> >development specialists and teachers who have little time but a great
>> >desire to improve ABLE practice. With the current financial situation 
>> >in>the field, there are few places to go to network with knowledable
>> >colleagues interested in best practices.  This site had and has 
>> >enormouspotential if it is left to deal with current problems and
>> solutions 
>> >such>as those called for by the US Department of Education's
>> Clearinghouse
>> >for Best Practices (website: http://www.w-w-c.org/topic4.html).
>> >
>> >If you and Catherine and Janet and George want to talk with each other
>> >about politics and philosophy, why not try an AOL chat room?
>> >
>> >Sherry Royce
>> >
>> >Dr. Sherry Royce
>> >Royce & Royce, Inc.
>> >1938 Crooked Oak Drive
>> >Lancaster, PA 17601
>> > 
>> >Tel: 717-569-1663
>> >email: sjroyce@comcast.net
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>


-- 
go here: www.geocities.com/andresmuro/art.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:15:09 EST