Return-Path: <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id h76EDW720010; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 10:13:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 10:13:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <4CD38E16.45CAAD48.0A349A3F@aol.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: AWilder106@aol.com To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-AALPD:561] RE: Who needs to know? X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0 Status: O Content-Length: 559 Lines: 9 (cont.) There are also different"rules of evidence" according to the research methodology or tradition one is following. There are also different rules regarding how that evidence is gathered. If I were doing a training on all this, I might use a taped segment of Law and Order, where all these issues are covered. Surprise endings often result when accepted "theory" doesn't pan out, doesn't explain something, some other fact or set of facts does. That makes for drama. OR--the expected conclusion is the correct one, unfortunately. Andrea
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:15:15 EST