[NIFL-AALPD:616] Re: Is research for everyone?

From: AWilder106@aol.com
Date: Thu Aug 28 2003 - 12:54:57 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id h7SGsv715051; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:54:57 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:54:57 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <417DF484.5BC71E1E.0A349A3F@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: AWilder106@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-AALPD:616] Re: Is research for everyone?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0
Status: O
Content-Length: 327
Lines: 10

Friends,

This is a reply to several posts.

1)  "Scientific methodology" still encompasses naturalistic  studies, ehtnographies, etc.  Validity and reliability have a place  there, too.


2)  I think teachers  deserve to learn about research  methodology, vocabulary.  Doesn't have to be  complicated, just well-done.

Andrea



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:15:16 EST