Return-Path: <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id i2VIfZm00268; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:41:45 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:41:45 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <146.25bec0fd.2d9c69f9@aol.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: Dlhargrove@aol.com To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-AALPD:1278] RE: participating online or at a distance X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5006 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Status: O Content-Length: 712 Lines: 17 David and all, In response to your question, "For asynchronous online PD to be interactive a lively discussion board is key. Guests and others: how can an online facilitator make a structured PD course or online module discussion board effective?" One idea that we're tossing around as we begin to edit/create new onPD is the notion of including an activity whereby the online user not only posts their own comments to a particular action/activity/assignment, but also that they choose 2 or 3 other users comments and actively compares and contrasts their comments with those of their own. We haven't implemented it yet, just something we're thinking about. Debra Debra L. Hargrove Florida TechNet
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:45:45 EST