[NIFL-AALPD:1793] Re: From Tom, Any scientific evidence for professional development?

From: AWilder106@aol.com
Date: Fri Dec 10 2004 - 13:54:59 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id iBAIsxU28203; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:54:59 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:54:59 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <362AF2A0.6F02EB41.0A349A3F@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: AWilder106@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-AALPD:1793] Re: From Tom, Any scientific evidence for professional development?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0
Status: O
Content-Length: 305
Lines: 9

Tom,

This is a hoot.

Supposedly you ("one") would have to examine the teacher's class before the teacher got "eddicated," then again afterwards.  

It would be interesting to concoct a study, though, with regression equations and every bell and whistle that would be needed to do such research.

Andrea



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:46:00 EST