Return-Path: <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id iBCIbcU10031; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 13:37:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 13:37:38 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <5D6F3164.4C25BCB5.0A349A3F@aol.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: AWilder106@aol.com To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-AALPD:1801] Re: Is all pd "good" pd? X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0 Status: O Content-Length: 446 Lines: 7 Eileen et al-- OOps! By "of course" I meant that teacher education/development/advancement can be found to work--as a broad category. I didn't mean that everything that calls itself PD will be found to work. I am thinking of that teacher snoozing in the third row.... Can you think of one case where PD worked? Improved student performance? I can. So, it works. We have to move on from there, having proved that the category exists. Andrea
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:46:01 EST