[NIFL-AALPD:1874] Re: Research agenda about PD?

From: David Rosen (djrosen@comcast.net)
Date: Wed Jan 05 2005 - 22:53:56 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j063rub11634; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:53:56 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:53:56 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <59B6E2E6-5F96-11D9-8419-00039381D39E@comcast.net>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: David Rosen <djrosen@comcast.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-AALPD:1874] Re: Research agenda about PD?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed
Status: O
Content-Length: 2660
Lines: 86

NIFL-AALPD Colleagues,

Cris Smith wrote:

" If we were to develop a research agenda about professional 
development in our field, what questions would you remove or add to 
this list? [below] "

I especially like C1, C2, C6, C7 and C9.  I think we need to focus on 
just a few questions.  Boiling it down to only three, C1,  C7 and C6 
would be my priorities.

I would add as a dimension of C1: Are program/staff development models 
more effective than just staff development models?

I would add language to the beginning of any of these which began 
"Under what circumstances, and with what kinds of teachers and 
programs.." or "Given [full-time teachers or] [volunteer tutors] or 
[part-time teachers] at a [novice] or [somewhat experienced] level, 
working with [ABE] or [ASE] or [ESOL/ESL] students at the [beginning] 
or [intermediate] or [advanced] level..."

I would be interested to hear what others think.

David J. Rosen
djrosen@comcast.net


Cris wrote:
In early December, there was a 3-day researcher and practitioner 
symposium in
Sacramento, California, co-sponsored by NCSALL, CALPRO, California 
Department
of Ed, called “Supporting Student Success: What the Research Tells Us.”
During the first day, participants generated research questions they 
would
like to see answered.  Many of the questions generated related to 
professional
development.  I’ve posted them below.  If we were to develop a research 
agenda
about professional development in our field, what questions would you 
remove
or add to this list?  Best…Cris

Professional Development (15)

C1. What are most effective models for professional development? (x3)

C2. How does professional development actually improve student learning 
gains?
(x3)

C4. Is there a common progression of experience that adult education 
teachers
go through on their way to becoming capable adult education teachers?

C5. How to improve instruction?

C6. Best mentoring model to support teachers?

C7. How [do] teachers change?

C8. How successful are adult educators or CTE teachers who come 
directly from
industry, without teacher education training? Where can I find 
professional
development for them?

C9. Are there effective models for motivating teachers to participate in
professional development?

C10. [Is there a] description of an effective model of professional
development to support open entry open exit programs that offer 
self-paced
competency based programs and for ABE and diploma adults?

C11. What is the best preparation for adult educators?

Cristine Smith
Deputy Director, NCSALL
World Education
44 Farnsworth Street
Boston, MA 02210
csmith@worlded.org
(617) 482-9485



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:28 EST