[NIFL-AALPD:1895] RE: Partisan issues

From: AWilder106@aol.com
Date: Thu Jan 13 2005 - 13:09:08 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j0DI98n02817; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 13:09:08 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 13:09:08 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <70C4D359.3AF9D006.0A349A3F@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: AWilder106@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-AALPD:1895] RE: Partisan issues
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0
Status: O
Content-Length: 729
Lines: 11

Jackie/Marie,

I think it is a great pity that there are not more divergent views on the lists, and I have wondered about that.  I think it is very useful to hear from others whose views are different from mine, even when I think they are wrong.  In fact, I think for our own education we should hear from divergent views.  

The censorship happened, as I recall, around the Iraq war and reauthorization of the WIA.Some writers went to great lengths to disguise in their posts what they were really talking about.

I know most of the lists are government sponsored, hence the censorship and the discouragement from lobbying for/against particular points of view.  

All this suggests that government is not discussable. 

Andrea



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:29 EST