Return-Path: <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j36FSBG07376; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:28:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:28:11 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <4291E13E@webmail.utk.edu> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: jataylor <jataylor@utk.edu> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-AALPD:2008] experiences with program imrovement X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas X-Mailer: Infinite Mobile Delivery (Hydra) SMTP v3.62.01 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Status: O Content-Length: 1061 Lines: 29 Hello Everyone, Last week was a busy TESOL week, and I hope all those who attended are energized with lots of ideas! Last Thursday, I suggested on this list that teachers should not only be compensated for paid professional development release time but also time to participate in program improvement. But first, I'd like to know your experiences either participating in or providing opportunities for teachers to participate in program improvement. Teachers, what is your role in program improvement in your area? What have you found to be the most effective way(s) to be involved? In what ways do programs and states support teacher participation in program improvement? Would those from Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, and other states comment? Does professional development necessarily lead to program improvement? What have program directors and others found to be the most effective options that integrate PD and PI? Thanks, all, I look forward to hearing from you! Best, Jackie Jackie Taylor List Facilitator NIFL-AALPD jataylor@utk.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:32 EST