[NIFL-AALPD:2031] review process, draft of policies

From: jataylor (jataylor@utk.edu)
Date: Tue Apr 12 2005 - 14:18:10 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j3CIIAG19670; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 14:18:10 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 14:18:10 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <42723BAA@webmail.utk.edu>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: jataylor <jataylor@utk.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-AALPD:2031] review process, draft of policies
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Infinite Mobile Delivery (Hydra) SMTP v3.62.01
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Status: O
Content-Length: 9812
Lines: 192

Hello Everyone,
Since Sunday, we have had more of our colleagues (practitioners, professional 
development staff, and learner leaders) subscribe to NIFL-AALPD, so I am 
re-posting the draft of professional development (PD) policies for easy 
reference (please see below). Please offer feedback regarding the whole 
platform or any specific policy (or policies) you would like to explore in 
greater depth.

What do you think about the draft below? What needs to be improved or changed? 
What are your policy recommendations?

I look forward to each of us contributing our thoughts for revisions such that 
the platform can evolve into a more substantive set of policies that would 
better reflect our collective perspective for supporting teachers to access 
and benefit from professional development. Thanks to all of you who have taken 
time to respond!

At the end of the week, we will incorporate your feedback regarding the PD 
policies and post a revision. If you have questions, feel free to email me at 
<jataylor@utk.edu>.

See below,
Jackie

Jackie Taylor, NIFL-AALPD List Moderator, jataylor@utk.edu
=======================================
April 10, 2005

NIFL-AALPD Subscribers,
Please see the draft PD policy platform below. This is only a draft, and we 
welcome your comments, criticisms, reflections, questions, clarifications, 
improvements, additions and ideas in an effort to create a list of PD policy 
options that represents the field's view.

The final list of draft PD policies will go to the AALPD Pre-Conference at 
COABE where participants will explore these issues in greater depth.

Ultimately the final product -- a list of recommendations for improving 
teacher working conditions and supporting teachers to access and benefit from 
professional development -- will be offered to state directors as they 
consider these issues while developing their state plans. We hope that the 
final version of these policy positions will also be supported by other 
organizations in the field (we would hope to incorporate such positions into 
policy platforms by, for example, the National Coalition for Literacy, an 
organization that advocates for supportive legislation and funding in our 
field).

What do you think about the draft below? What needs to be improved or changed? 
What are your policy recommendations?

Please see below,
Jackie Taylor, List Moderator, NIFL-AALPD, jataylor@utk.edu
========================================
Goal:

The adoption of policies at the national, state and local level that support 
adult basic education, adult ESOL, and adult secondary education practitioners 
(including program directors) to access and benefit from professional 
development sufficient to help them be effective teachers, tutors and 
administrators.


Policies in Support of Adequate and Effective Professional Development:

1) Paid Professional Development Release Time: Every teacher practitioner 
should have a minimum of 2.5% of their annual working time as paid 
professional development (e.g., a full-time teacher, working 40 hours a week 
at 40 weeks a year—summers and holidays off—would work 1600 hours a year, so 
2.5% would equal 40 hours of paid professional development a year (equivalent 
to 5 paid days).

2) Expectations for Participation in Professional Development: Every program 
and state should set and publicize the expectation that all teachers, no 
matter how experienced, must have a relevant professional development plan and 
are expected to continue learning throughout their careers.

3) Professional Development Plans: Each program should be funded at 1% of its 
annual staff hours to conduct a process for teachers to develop an annual 
professional development plan that dovetails with the program’s improvement 
process (which starts from students’ needs for improvements in instruction and 
services). All teachers should be required to have PD plans, and programs 
should be monitored to see that these are real and meaningful to teachers and 
to the program.

4) Participation in Program Improvement: A minimum of 2.0% of each program's 
budget should be set aside for teachers to participate in program improvement 
[such as designing a new curriculum (not just lesson planning), recruiting, 
designing a new student orientation, etc.], that starts with the students' 
needs for improving program structures and services. Programs should 
systematically set and evaluate program improvement goals, and as part of 
their program improvement plans to describe the role, resources and major 
activities of PD which will enable teachers to acquire the needed knowledge 
and skills.

5) Teacher Evaluation: Programs should conduct a teacher performance 
evaluation that asks teachers to show evidence that they have acquired new 
skills and knowledge described in the goals of their professional development 
plans.

6) Tuition reimbursement: Programs should be funded to provide tuition 
reimbursement at the equivalent of one college course per semester to teachers 
who have higher education attainment as a part of their professional 
development plans.

7) Relevance of Professional Development Activities: Every state literacy 
resource center or professional development system/agency and every program 
must use the professional development plans of the practitioners in their 
state or program to plan professional development activities relevant to 
teachers’ and (ultimately) students’ needs.

8) Orientation for New Teachers: Every new teacher should have an orientation 
to teaching in the field of adult basic education within the first 6 months of 
their teaching. Orientations include an introduction to adult learning and a 
brief history/overview of the funding, structure, institutions and history of 
the field, as well as basic training in curriculum development, lesson 
planning, and teaching reading, writing, math, and speaking skills for the 
types of adult learners that teacher serves most frequently.

9) Access: Every practitioner should have access to professional development, 
throughout the year, both inside and outside of his/her program, and every 
practitioner should have access to a variety of types of professional 
development (conferences, workshops, study circles, etc.) on a variety of 
content, organized at a variety of times and locations, including on-line 
options.

10) Professional Development System: Each state should have a funded state 
literacy resource center or other agency that provides direct professional 
development to practitioners AND technical assistance to help programs 
organize in-house professional development.

11) Quality of Professional Development: Facilitators of professional 
development should have completed some preparation (a course or other type of 
training) about the research-based principles of effective professional 
development design and facilitation, and every facilitator should be observed 
at least once conducting training and provided feedback about his/her design 
and facilitation skills.

12) Teachers’ Working Conditions: In addition to paid professional development 
release time, programs should have sufficient resources to fund adequate 
working conditions that will allow teachers to make change as a result of the 
professional development they attend, including:

• Benefits for all teachers (including part-time),
• paid prep time for all teachers (including part-time),
• access for all teachers to at least one hour a week of sharing time with 
either colleagues or a coordinator who supports their teaching, and
• at least monthly mechanisms (staff meetings, meetings with director) for 
voicing their input/decision making within the program.

13) Teachers’ Involvement in the Field of Adult Education: Every practitioner 
should receive at least 1% of their annual working time to participate in 
activities as a member of the field, including:
• providing professional development to other teachers inside or outside of 
the program,
• working towards addressing students’ needs (transportation, child care, 
health services, job assistance, etc.) that may prevent students from 
participating in the program, and
• building community partnerships (with the health care system, K-12 system, 
libraries, local businesses, career centers, etc.) to improve services to 
adult learners.


**Examples/Recommendations**

A) Examples of Professional Development Activities:

Build in sufficient paid time for teachers and administrators to engage in 
professional development activities as a part of paid professional development 
release time:

1) Encourage participation in substantive PD, such as: adding a major new set 
of teaching skills; learning a major new area of content to teach; peer 
evaluation, peer mentoring, and/or systematic supervision; conducting 
classroom and other kinds of research; writing a journal article; learning to 
use -- and integrate -- new technology for student learning; or adding a new 
dimension to the role of teacher such as counselor, public policy advocate, 
assessment specialist, or LD specialist.

2) Encourage participation in workshops, conferences, and short courses, but 
consider this as a lesser priority than participation in more significant 
professional development activities (like those listed in 1 above) which are 
sustained over time.


B) Examples for Establishing Expectations to Participate in PD:

Administrators, including supervisors, and other colleagues can encourage 
teachers to grow professionally, for example, by providing paid work time for 
PD, by including PD activities as part of a teacher job description, by 
putting PD on the agenda at staff meetings, and by setting aside a time (a day 
a month, for example) for PD work and staff discussion about it.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:33 EST