Return-Path: <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j3LHQbG28971; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 13:26:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 13:26:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1d9.3af969c0.2f993bc1@aol.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: BlastGrant@aol.com To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-AALPD:2078] Re: realizing strengths X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 1200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Status: O Content-Length: 565 Lines: 17 Re-reading the posts from the week, almost everything written has been in support of involving students in teacher training. But I've also gotten the sense that its not done very often. I'd like to ask the list what you see as the barriers to involving students in teacher training. Why don't more programs involve students in PD? Including student leaders in PD is not always easy, always appropriate, or always feasible. What do you see as the problems with including students in your PD? What issues will arise as you include students?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:34 EST