Return-Path: <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j7OF5bG11576; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:05:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:05:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <008101c5a8bc$5ee5e590$c1cd193f@ReflectionPool> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: "Catherine B. King" <cb.king@verizon.net> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-AALPD:2245] National Science Foundations X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=original X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 Status: O Content-Length: 2038 Lines: 44 Hello All: For your information (note conclusions 1-2-3 below): The National Science Foundation has just published a workshop report titled "Research Policy as an Agent of Change" (NSF 05-209). Here are a few paragraphs from the opening of the executive summary: "In October 2003, an NSF-sponsored workshop on research policy as an agent of change was held in Tucson, Arizona, under the auspices of the University of Arizona. The workshop explored the role of research policies in a time of significant scientific, technological, and social change. Scholars from a wide range of relevant disciplines, as well as a number of NSF staff, met for two days to discuss what is, and what is not, known about how research policy contributes-in both intended and unintended ways-to major societal transformations. "This report is intended to capture the central themes of the workshop discussions. It begins with an executive summary that presents the participants' main conclusions. The body of the report describes major issues addressed in the discussions. These issues have been grouped under the headings infrastructure, benefits of research policy, unintended consequences, and critical research needs. The appendices present the workshop agenda, the short statements that participants wrote prior to arrival in Tucson, and brief descriptions of the small group discussions that took place on the second day of the workshop. "Participants reached three main conclusions: 1. A focused effort to study research policy as an agent of change RPAC) is urgently needed. 2. Studies of RPAC will require the use of diverse research methods informed by a range of disciplinary, interdisciplinary, and multidisciplinary perspectives. 3. NSF should explore ways to encourage research in this area." Copies of the report are available from NSF. Send a request via e-mail to Diane McKay at mmckay@nsf.gov. You can also view it on line at http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf05209
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:39 EST