Return-Path: <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j7P1MYG18602; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 21:22:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 21:22:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <BF3286F5.734D%varshna@grandecom.net> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: Varshna Narumanchi-Jackson <varshna@grandecom.net> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-AALPD:2248] Re: National Science Foundations X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-type: text/plain; Status: O Content-Length: 4464 Lines: 105 Talking about throwing good money after bad... does anybody know when the US Dept of Education is going to implement the OMB's Common Measures that address Job Training and Employment program investments, including adult education (Title II of the Workforce Investment Act)? I haven't been able to locate any guidance. I may just be searching in the wrong nooks and crannies of ED's web site. Thanks, Varshna Narumanchi-Jackson Austin, TX on 8/24/05 5:34 PM, Roberta McKnight at rkmcknight@comcast.net wrote: > Hi Mona and Catherine, > > You are RIGHT ON Mona - vast resources are wasted on studies often > outsourced cronyistically without attention to the requisite bidding > guidelines of various agencies (governments) and the results of these > studies are not fully disclosed and do not focus on sustainability. > > These issues must be addressed at the grass roots level and, just as > programs are held accountable for NRS progress - so too, must > governmental agencies be held accountable for the results of their > funding initiatives/outsourcing. Too often, monies are spent on > meetings, luncheons and the like, without students and teachers ever > deriving any benefit from the stated purpose of the initiative. > > Thanks for bringing attention to these concerns, > > Roberta McKnight > Healthcare Multimedia Design > http://www.hcmmdesign.net > > Mona Curtis wrote: > >> <>Maybe I've just spent too much time in the trenches, the classroom >> that is, to appreciate research. It seems that more money needs to be >> spent on implementing what we already know and less on researching and >> getting new information. The conclusion of this study is that there >> needs to be more research on how research influences change. We >> already know what good instruction is and a lot of what it is is a low >> student/teacher ratio, which translates into more teachers and more >> full-time, well-compensated teachers rather than part-time teachers >> who have to juggle several jobs and can't give their full attention to >> their students and their needs. >> >> Mona Curtis >> ESL Coordinator >> Treasure Valley Community College >> 650 College Blvd. >> Ontario, OR 97914 >> www.tvcc.cc >> 541-881-8822 x 316 >> fax 541-881-2747 > >> <>cb.king@verizon.net 08/24/05 09:00AM >>> >> >> Hello All: >> >> For your information (note conclusions 1-2-3 below): >> >> The National Science Foundation has just published a workshop report titled >> "Research Policy as an Agent of Change" (NSF 05-209). Here are a few >> paragraphs from the opening of the executive summary: >> >> "In October 2003, an NSF-sponsored workshop on research policy as an agent of >> change was held in Tucson, Arizona, under the auspices of the University of >> Arizona. The workshop explored the role of research policies in a time of >> significant scientific, technological, and social change. Scholars >> from a wide range of relevant disciplines, as well as a number of NSF staff, >> met for two days to discuss what is, and what is not, known about how >> research policy contributes-in both intended and unintended ways-to major >> societal transformations. >> >> "This report is intended to capture the central themes of the workshop >> discussions. It begins with an executive summary that presents the >> participants' main conclusions. The body of the report describes major >> issues addressed in the discussions. These issues have been grouped under >> the headings infrastructure, benefits of research policy, unintended >> consequences, and critical research needs. The appendices present the >> workshop agenda, the short statements that participants wrote prior to >> arrival in Tucson, and brief descriptions of the small group >> discussions that took place on the second day of the workshop. >> >> "Participants reached three main conclusions: >> >> 1. A focused effort to study research policy as an agent of change (RPAC) >> is urgently needed. >> >> 2. Studies of RPAC will require the use of diverse research methods >> informed by a range of disciplinary, interdisciplinary, and >> multidisciplinary perspectives. >> >> 3. NSF should explore ways to encourage research in this area." >> >> Copies of the report are available from NSF. Send a request via e-mail to >> Diane McKay at mmckay@nsf.gov. You can also view it on line at >> >> http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf05209 >> >> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:39 EST