[NIFL-AALPD:2251] Update, AALPD and PD Policies

From: jataylor (jataylor@utk.edu)
Date: Thu Aug 25 2005 - 21:50:52 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j7Q1oqG17657; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 21:50:52 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 21:50:52 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <4344D448@webmail.utk.edu>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: jataylor <jataylor@utk.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-AALPD:2251] Update, AALPD and PD Policies
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Infinite Mobile Delivery (Hydra) SMTP v3.62.01
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Status: O
Content-Length: 9473
Lines: 188

Colleagues -
An important development is close at hand that requires our attention. As you 
may know, AALPD has been synthesizing your ideas from discussions (in-person 
and on NIFL-AALPD) of professional development policies. These policies, if 
adopted by states, ProLiteracy, and other members of the National Coalition 
for Literacy, could change how practitioners (teachers, tutors, 
administrators, and learner leaders who work in the field) are supported to 
access and benefit from professional development. Introducing State Directors 
to policies that could improve their state PD systems is our first step in 
this direction.

We are asking you -- over the next 2-3 weeks -- to examine the draft PD 
Policies and the PD Matrix closely, and ask questions. Post feedback either to 
the list or email feedback to: <jataylor@utk.edu>. Provide examples from your 
program or state that we can add to the PD Matrix. Invite your adult education 
colleagues and professional associations to offer input.

Draft Executive Summary of PD Policies [Only lists the PD Policies]:
http://wiki.literacytent.org/index.php/PDPolicyUpdate7-29-05

PD Policy Matrix [Lists the policies, rationale (from research) and a 
description of what the PD Policies could look like in practice (with examples 
in some cases)]:
http://wiki.literacytent.org/index.php/PDPolicyMatrix

On September 14th, we will be closing the draft policies and the PD Matrix for 
feedback from the field. We will make final revisions, then the policies will 
go to the AALPD membership for a vote this fall. After the vote, AALPD will 
give the PD Policies to State Directors to use at the November State 
Director's meeting (NAEPDC meeting) in Denver; where State Directors have 
committed to address how they would utilize these policy options as they 
develop their multi-year state plans.

We have been considering _everyone's_ feedback very carefully. We believe that 
it is important that we -- as a professional development community, use this 
opportunity to build a vision of professional development that we can all 
stand behind.

See the list of draft PD Policies below and visit: 
http://wiki.literacytent.org/index.php/PDPolicyMatrix to view or print the PD 
Matrix.  We look forward to hearing from you.

Committee on Advocacy, Association of Adult Literacy Professional Developers,

Cristine Smith
Jackie Taylor
David J. Rosen
============================
AALPD Recommended Policies to Support Professional Development for Adult 
Education Practitioners
Executive Summary

Goal:

The adoption of policies at national, state and local levels that adequately 
support the participation of adult basic education, adult ESOL, and adult 
secondary education practitioners (including paraprofessionals and learner 
leaders who are staff members) in professional development which will help 
them be effective teachers, tutors, counselors, and administrators.

Policies:

1. Orientation/Induction for Teachers New to Adult Education: All teachers new 
to adult education should have an orientation to teaching in the field of 
adult basic education within the first 6 months of their teaching.


2. Expectations for Participation in Professional Development: Every state and 
program should expect that all practitioners, no matter how experienced, will 
continue professional learning throughout their careers.


3. Professional Development Plans: Each program should be funded a minimum of 
1% of its annual staff hours to support teachers in developing an annual 
professional development plan that begins with a practitioner needs assessment 
and dovetails with its program improvement process. All teachers should have 
PD plans, and programs should be monitored to see that these are real and 
meaningful to teachers and to the program.


4. Paid Professional Development Release Time: All practitioners should have a 
minimum of 2.5% of their annual working time as paid professional development. 
Paid professional development includes any professional learning activity 
(group or individual) that advances practitioners towards achieving the goals 
outlined in their professional development plans.


5. Participation in Program Improvement: A minimum of 2% of each program's 
budget should be set aside for teachers to participate in program improvement 
[such as designing a new curriculum (not just lesson planning), improving 
recruiting, designing a new student orientation, using data for program 
improvement, etc.].


6. Participation in the Field of Adult Education: All full-time practitioners 
should be funded for at least 1% of their annual working time to participate 
in activities as a member of the field, including:

- providing professional development to other teachers inside or outside of 
the program,
- working towards addressing students’ needs (transportation, child care, 
health services, job assistance, etc.) that may prevent students from 
participating in the program, and
- building community partnerships (with the health care system, K-12 system, 
libraries, local businesses, career centers, etc.) to improve services to 
adult learners.


7. Teachers’ Working Conditions: In addition to paid professional development 
time, programs should have sufficient resources to provide working conditions 
that will allow teachers to stay in the field, find the work satisfying, and 
grow professionally, including:

- Adequate teacher salaries
- benefits for all teachers (including part-time),
- paid prep time for all teachers (including part-time),
- access for all teachers to at least one hour a week of professional sharing 
time with either colleagues or a coordinator who supports their teaching, and 
- at least monthly mechanisms (staff meetings, meetings with director) for 
voicing their ideas and participating in decisions about the program.


8. Tuition Reimbursement: Programs should be funded to provide tuition 
reimbursement at the equivalent of one college course per semester to teachers 
who have higher education attainment as a part of their professional 
development plans.


9. Performance Evaluation and Professional Improvement: Programs should 
conduct performance evaluations of practitioners, who should show evidence of 
achievement, including: application of learning and reflection, or acquisition 
of new skills and knowledge, as described in the goals of their professional 
development plans. The performance evaluation results should be used to inform 
practitioners’ future PD planning.


10. Professional Development System: Each state should have a funded state 
literacy resource center or other agency that provides direct professional 
development to practitioners and technical assistance to help programs 
organize in-house professional development. A person should be designated in 
each program and paid to be the (most often part-time) coordinator of program 
and professional development.


11. Balance between State-driven and Teacher-Driven Professional Development: 
Every state literacy resource center or professional development system/agency 
and every program should use the professional development plans of the 
practitioners in their state or program and/or use needs assessments (in which 
teachers, administrators, and adult learners have participated) to plan 
professional development activities relevant to and driven by teachers’ and 
(ultimately) students’ needs. The needs for professional development as 
defined by practitioners and adult learners, as well as the needs for program 
improvement, should be evenly balanced with the needs of the state ABE 
regulating agency/ies.


12. Access to Professional Development Activities: The state literacy resource 
center or statewide professional development agency/system should have the 
mandate and funding to ensure that every practitioner (new and experienced, 
part-time and full-time) has access to professional development, throughout 
the year, both inside and outside of his/her program, and that every 
practitioner has access to a variety of types of professional development 
(conferences, workshops, study circles, courses, teacher research and other 
forms of more sustained PD, etc.) with a variety of content, organized at a 
variety of times and locations, including on-line options.


13. Quality of Professional Development: Full-time facilitators of 
professional development should complete an annual plan for organizing and 
delivering professional development, to be reviewed by an advisory group made 
up of practitioners. Professional developers should be funded to spend a 
minimum of 2% of their time each year teaching in the ABE/ESOL classroom.


14. Adult Learner Voice in Professional Development: The state professional 
development agency and each individual program should have dedicated funding 
to ensure that adult learners’ voices are included in developing professional 
development policies and in delivering professional development at the local 
program, state, and federal levels.


15. Professional Development for Learner Leaders Who Work in the Field: 
Current or former students who are tutors, administrators, program 
coordinators, and counselors, should have access to professional development 
offered by state professional development and technical assistance agencies, 
given additional PD to meet their needs if necessary, and/ or granted 
internships to work and learn within the program.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:39 EST