Return-Path: <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j9B49xG08828; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 00:09:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 00:09:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <4354A901@webmail.utk.edu> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: jataylor <jataylor@utk.edu> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-AALPD:2294] learning and PD X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas X-Mailer: Infinite Mobile Delivery (Hydra) SMTP v3.62.01 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Status: O Content-Length: 605 Lines: 13 Hello all, I've been thinking about institutions that provide professional development and how factors such as guiding principles, the framework within which the organization operates and how it learns, shades the professional development that's available. Do you see this as something that affects the professional development offered by programs/groups/organizations? If so, how? I'm not sure if this is a separate question, but what are the qualities of an effective PD group or organization that keeps it 'in-tune' and 'in-time' with the field? Any thoughts on that? Thanks -- Jackie Taylor
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:40 EST