[NIFL-AALPD:2295] Re: learning and PD

From: David Rosen (djrosen@comcast.net)
Date: Tue Oct 11 2005 - 07:50:18 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j9BBoIG26671; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 07:50:18 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 07:50:18 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3D96FFAB-47D4-4BE3-B987-F5C9CB6D71B7@comcast.net>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: David Rosen <djrosen@comcast.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-aalpd@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-AALPD:2295] Re: learning and PD
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Status: O
Content-Length: 3026
Lines: 69

Hello Jackie and others,

On Oct 11, 2005, at 12:08 AM, jataylor wrote:

> I've been thinking about institutions that provide professional  
> development
> and how factors such as guiding principles, the framework within  
> which the
> organization operates and how it learns, shades the professional  
> development
> that's available. Do you see this as something that affects the  
> professional
> development offered by programs/groups/organizations? If so, how?

The framework within which the PD organization works is very  
important to what it can accomplish. Organizations that provide  
professional development for adult literacy educators are usually  
funded to carry out a mission, meet certain goals and objectives,  
carry out a work plan, and meet practitioners' needs for professional  
growth.  Some key questions in understanding what they do are:

1. Who or what drives the mission, goals, objectives, and work plan  
of the PD organization?  What needs are to be met for what  
practitioners  -- according to whom? Needs according to the  
practitioners themselves? According to a PD organization's advisory  
board? According to the funder(s) -- for example, a state agency  
responsible for adult literacy education? Or some combination of these?

2. To what extent is how needs are defined driven by a state agency,  
by a PD organization, or by the field?  Are these perspectives in  
balance or in conflict? (If there is conflict, are the differences  
negotiated and resolved well? )

3. If the goals of the PD organization involve change in teacher or  
program practice, what exactly (observably and measurably) are the  
changes the agency is trying to bring about?

4.  Are these planned changes based on documented professional wisdom  
or research?

5.  Are the planned changes aligned with the mission and goals of the  
PD organization? The funder(s)? The field?

6. What evidence is there that the PD organization is achieving its  
goals, effecting the planned changes, and improving the quality of  
practitioners' and program practice?


Another important variable which determines what professional  
development is offered is the professional work environment for  
practitioners.  What change is possible is often tempered by the  
limitations of a severely under-funded professional workforce.  A  
workforce of primarily part-time instructors, and marginal or  
unstable funding which results in job instability or jobs whose  
salaries are not family-sustaining, leads to frequent teacher  
turnover.  Part-time teachers often do not have the time to  
participate in face-to-face professional development because they  
have other part-time or full-time jobs.  These factors of the work  
environment may shade what professional development can be offered.   
The best professional development may be in-depth, taking place over  
weeks or months, but if practitioners are not able to participate, PD  
organizations will not offer it.

David J. Rosen
djrosen@comcast.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:40 EST