[NIFL-ASSESSMENT:43] Re: question

From: Nashansen@aol.com
Date: Sun Nov 11 2001 - 01:36:34 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id fAB6aY000706; Sun, 11 Nov 2001 01:36:34 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 01:36:34 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <141.469f9dd.291f75d6@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: Nashansen@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:43] Re: question
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 115
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Status: O
Content-Length: 2987
Lines: 56

In a message dated 11/07/2001 6:27:04 PM Central Standard Time, 
dbaycich@archon.educ.kent.edu writes:

<<  I've been thinking about the respones I received from my questions about
 alternative assessments (I'm a slow thinker).
 I better understand the reluctance to use alternative assessments when the
 standardized tests are the ones that "matter". Do any of you think there is
 a way to convince the folks who want the numbers that they are not getting
 the whole picture of what we do?
 Do you think the numbers game will change with the move toward EFF?
 I'm interested to hear your thoughts. >>


Dear Dianna,

I also am interested and a very slow thinker .... one who contemplates and 
does the best she can to meet the needs of others.  

I have been lurking at this listserv hoping answers will arise because I am 
really struggling with the assessment requirement tied to any future funding. 
 I want to know what it is that the "powers that be" are attempting to 
measure when it comes to TABE testing someone with as limited literacy skills 
as I see in the adult population I serve in the Sioux Falls Area Literacy 
Council in South Dakota.  I have even tried to advocate against the timed 
testing and using such standardized tests with our new AEL Director within 
the S.D. Dept. of Labor and really have had a deaf ear turned.  (She gives no 
clear cut answer to the above question either.)

You asked if the numbers game will change with the move toward EFF:  I feel 
it already has become more of an emphasis. I don't quite know if it was the 
switch to EFF or the switch from Dept. of Educ. to Dept. of Labor 
allocations.  The emphasis appeared to me to take an immediate sharp turn 
toward employment as a primary focus and unfortunately for *my* learners, 
that's truly not the case for their enrollment.  Their goal in enrolling also 
wasn't primarily prep for GED acquisition *either* but at least there was 
some fluidity with the DOE.  

It frightens me.  I think this turn of events will eventually pull the 
pillars right from under *my* program ... don't know about others and 
anxiously await input as to whether they feel as strongly as do I.  The 
purpose for learning to read is so individualized that each of the adults 
with whom I match a volunteer will express diverse reasons.  They might say 
"I just had to *do* this for MySelf!" or "I lost my job because there was no 
other job in the workplace for me when I was injured and didn't have enough 
literacy skills to transfer to a position requiring reading, writing and 
spelling."  Or maybe that prospective learner hasn't even gotten to first 
base when it comes to a job search.  Another learner might be doing it 
because they want to be able to write a letter home, read a preschooler a 
book, find a street in their community.  I could go on, but won't. 

I am interested in further response as well.

Nancy Hansen
Sioux Falls Area Literacy Council
Sioux Falls, SD
sfliteracy@mcleodusa.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:33:24 EST