Return-Path: <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g7A1qdX07440; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 21:52:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 21:52:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3D547115.1050406@theworld.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: "David J. Rosen" <DJRosen@theworld.com> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:180] [Fwd: Low-level literacy assessments] X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Status: O Content-Length: 1694 Lines: 45 Colleagues, Apologies for the typos in my last posting. Here's a corrected version. David J. Rosen ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NIFL-Assessment Colleagues, Nancy Hansen wrote (on the NLA list, and cross-posted on NIFL-Assessment): > As *I* have made abundantly clear in the past, one of the issues > that *I* have is "proper assessments ... for low literacy adults". > I am encouraged to read that terminology is right *in* there. > It's a critical issue as far as I'm concerned. I feel required > testing with inaccurate tools is an insurmountable roadblock to > offering to *all* citizens the right to read. > Our adults deserve something better that will, on a more *real* > level, assess "their skills and knowledge. I have been looking at the Canadian _Adult Diagnostic Reading Inventory_ (Pat M. Campbell, and Flo M. Brokop, authors, Grass Roots Press, Edmonton, Alberta) The ADRI is "based on the social constructivist theory in which reading is viewed as the active construction of meaning from cues in the text and from the reader's background knowledge, within a social context." It can be used for placement or diagnosis, and contains a graded word list and reading passages from levels 1 - 9. The authors claim that it is designed so that pre- and post-testing passages are parallel in difficulty. I wonder if anyone on this list has used this assessment with low level literacy adults, and if you have found it: useful for diagnosis and/or placement, a positive experience for learners, and easy and relatively quick to administer (the authors say it takes 30-60 minutes.) David J. Rosen DJRosen@theworld.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:46:25 EST