Return-Path: <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g9HCxnX10077; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 08:59:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 08:59:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3DAEB417.487988C3@doe.state.vt.us> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: Kay Charron <kcharron@doe.state.vt.us> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:211] Re: intake placement instruments X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; I) Status: O Content-Length: 685 Lines: 25 Why can't you use the BEST for placement? Cheryl Pyburn wrote: > Hi everyone. > > Any ideas about what to use for an initial placement > instrument since we can no longer use the BEST for > ESOL placement? Right now our counselors are placing > students in classes based on a short conversation and > some sample writing; however, this doesn't seem to be > working -- students are being placed in classes that > are too low for them. > > What do other learning centers use? Thanks. > > ===== > Cheryl Pyburn > Operation Bootstrap > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More > http://faith.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:46:26 EST