Return-Path: <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id h5B8xjC11615; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 04:59:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 04:59:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <7A86EC4F.1BD374C4.0004C68E@aol.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: HthKar@aol.com To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:287] Re: What alternative assessments do you use? X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0 Status: O Content-Length: 236 Lines: 3 Regarding alternative assessments, the best summary of these that I have encountered is in a doctorate by Jane Mackillop who was working in New York for some time. (The theses is at the University of Sheffield, England). Karen Heath.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:15:31 EST