[NIFL-ASSESSMENT:442] time and responsibility for assessment and record-keeping

From: Eileen Eckert (eileeneckert@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Mar 26 2004 - 20:14:27 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id i2R1ERm01773; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 20:14:27 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 20:14:27 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <F9bxpqyDp6fwqMfiim80000658e@hotmail.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Eileen Eckert" <eileeneckert@hotmail.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:442] time and responsibility for assessment and record-keeping
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Status: O
Content-Length: 2588
Lines: 56

Nick,
I'm not sure what new teacher behavior, paperwork, and record-keeping you're 
referring to, but teacher time is always a big issue. If you mean that 
assessment or documentation of things like attendance improvements and 
students calling in when they can't be there, Don said that in his program 
they're already doing that, so I didn't see including students as a big 
additional chore. Adding assessments could be a big time and energy drain 
for the teacher, but it doesn't have to be.

If students know the assessment criteria and learn in class how to do a 
self-evaluation, they can keep a binder/folder with their records and 
self-evaluations. You could allow time for them to update those records 
during class, and use that time to meet with individuals and give feedback 
on progress and next steps while the rest are working on their own.

Just my opinion, but I believe that time spent on non-content assessment and 
student self-evaluation is not a diversion from the main event of teaching; 
it's an important part of it. If students master content but never become 
aware and choose their learning strategies, attitudes, and work habits, then 
they may be (and remain) dependent on a teacher or other "authority" to be 
the arbiter of their success instead of making informed choices for 
themselves.

I've been working with teachers to develop rubrics and student 
self-evaluation forms that meet their needs; these teachers typically spend 
about 25 hours per week in the classroom (treated like teaching machines, 
but that another issue) so anything they use has to be really 
teacher-friendly. I'd be happy to send samples on to you.

Eileen



From: "Nixon S. Griffis" <ngriffis@bellsouth.net>
Reply-To: nifl-assessment@nifl.gov
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:441] RE: Feedback about new, better, teacher 
behavior and its' connected strategy
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:03:08 -0500 (EST)

Feedback: More paperwork and more record keeping pushed into the teacher's
already too small window. This must  always be kept in mind when thinking of
new stratagem for positive changes that the teaCHER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR.
What does this new advised behavior replace or make more time/effort saving?

Nick Griffis
Adult Education
Inlet Grove H.S.
Riviera Beach,
Florida 33480
561-882-9967

_________________________________________________________________
Get reliable access on MSN 9 Dial-up. 3 months for the price of 1! 
(Limited-time offer) http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200361ave/direct/01/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:46:12 EST