[NIFL-ASSESSMENT:565] RE: Literacy President

From: Eileen Eckert (eileeneckert@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri May 21 2004 - 14:58:52 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id i4LIwqm14233; Fri, 21 May 2004 14:58:52 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 14:58:52 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <Sea2-F19yUXhtJiRq1y00059a3a@hotmail.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Eileen Eckert" <eileeneckert@hotmail.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:565] RE: Literacy President
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Status: O
Content-Length: 2243
Lines: 56

Jackie,
You haven't said who feels your post was inappropriate, but it makes me 
wonder to whom the Constitution is supposed to apply if not to the people 
who live under it? Please keep speaking out; whether we <continue to> live 
in a democracy or not depends more on whether we act like we do than on 
whether we have a Constitution as an historical document.

I am fascinated to see the willingness of some to silence anything 
"sensitive" or "inappropriate," especially in light of the 50th anniversary 
of Brown v. Board, which never would have happened if some brave people had 
placed more importance on sensitivities and appropriateness.

I would like to know if our presumed Democratic candidate would continue the 
violations of good assessment practices, such as making high stakes 
judgments based on a single administration of a single assessment 
instrument, that have become standard in the NRS and No Child Left Behind 
under the current administration.

Eileen


From: jataylor <jataylor@utk.edu>
Reply-To: nifl-assessment@nifl.gov
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:564] Literacy President
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 12:59:15 -0400 (EDT)

Colleagues:
Last Friday, May 14th, I posted a message to NIFL lists titled "Literacy
President." Literacy President is a collaborative, non-partisan initiative
supported by Voice for Adult Literacy United for Education (VALUE), The 
Change
Agent, and other groups designed to:

- raise national awareness of adult literacy regardless of who is elected;
- ask Presidential candidates broad questions about adult literacy; and
- engage adult learners and practitioners around contextualized teaching and
learning on civic education and learner leadership using the EFF Citizen 
Role
Map and EFF Content Standards.

It has been called to my attention that although the post I made (as a 
private
citizen) for the group was permissible based on all lists' guidelines, it 
was
also of a politically-sensitive nature and some feel it may not be 
appropriate
for NIFL lists. My intention was to alert teachers about an exciting new
project. If my post has caused any confusion, I apologize.

Jackie

Jackie Taylor
jataylor_1@yahoo.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:46:16 EST