[NIFL-ASSESSMENT:656] RE: BEST Test review

From: Carol Van Duzer (carol@cal.org)
Date: Thu Sep 16 2004 - 15:02:12 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id i8GJ2CR02329; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:02:12 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:02:12 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <300BEB3101730B459922DE1D3B4AED890116BFB1@hobbes2.cal.org>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Carol Van Duzer" <carol@cal.org>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:656] RE: BEST Test review
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
Status: O
Content-Length: 3092
Lines: 78

The review of the Basic English Skills Test (BEST) that appears in the
most recent edition of the ESL in Adult Education Interest Section
E-Newsletter confuses two assessments currently in use in the field--
BEST and BEST Plus. 

The original BEST, developed in the early 1980s, has two sections: the
Oral Interview Section and the Literacy Skills Section. The test
reviewed in the article is Form C of the  BEST Oral Interview and the
validity and reliability data presented relate to this older test. The
information regarding cost is related to the BEST Plus.

In 2003, the Center for Applied Linguistics (CAL) released an updated
version of the Oral Interview, now known as BEST Plus. This comes in two
versions: computer-adaptive and semi-adaptive print-based. Both versions
are administered as face-to-face oral interviews. The updated BEST Plus
reflects advances in the application of new technology to developments
in language testing and educational measurement of second language
acquisition. BEST Plus assesses communicative ability through the use of
questions tied to authentic situations that arise in daily life-at home,
at work, and in the community. Each response is evaluated for
Comprehension (How well des the examinee under the test item?),
Complexity (How well des the examinee organize and elaborate the
response?), and Communication (How clearly does the examinee communicate
meaning?). 

Both BEST and BEST Plus are designed for use in the United States with
immigrants and refugees who have left their country and come to live in
the U.S. 

Additional information about BEST Plus and BEST can be found on the CAL
Web site.
For the new BEST Plus go to http://cal.org/bestplus/
For BEST go to http://cal.org/BEST
 

Carol Van Duzer
BEST Plus Training Coordinator
Center for Applied Linguistics
4646 40th St. NW
Washington, DC 20016
Tel 202-362-0700
Carol@cal.org 

-----Original Message-----
From: nifl-assessment@nifl.gov [mailto:nifl-assessment@nifl.gov] On
Behalf Of Marie Cora
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 9:53 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:654] BEST Test review

Good morning, afternoon, and evening everyone,

I came across a BEST Test review in the latest TESOL Adult Education
Interest Section Newsletter.  It's Volume 2, Issue 2.  I receive the
newsletter electronically, but I do believe you must be a TESOL member
to receive the publication, so I am unable to forward you the article.
(If anyone on the list knows better about this than me, please let us
know - if we can share this article here, then we should if possible).

I wanted to bring this to your attention at any rate.  It appears to be
written by an EFL instructor who is in South Korea.

On a related note, if you are not familiar with the TESOL Adult
Education Interest Section, you can learn some info at:

http://www.smace.org/tesol/aeis.html

Thanks,

marie cora
Moderator, NIFL Assessment Discussion List, and Coordinator/Developer
LINCS Assessment Special Collection at
http://literacy.kent.edu/Midwest/assessment/


marie.cora@hotspurpartners.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:46:20 EST