Return-Path: <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id i9JFtXa04036; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:55:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:55:33 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <52220291.103CC7A7.0A349A3F@aol.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: AWilder106@aol.com To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:671] X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0 Status: O Content-Length: 523 Lines: 9 Friends, I'm going to assume that most readers can read just fine. However there are some readers with specific issues 1) trouble matching sounds to symbols (auditory matching) 2) trouble matching symbols to sounds (visual matching) and 3) those readers with difficulties in both modalities. What instruments do you use to sort out these learning differences? That is, if you do sort out the learning differences or find it necessary? Which instruments are most useful to you? Thanks for any information. Andrea
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:46:20 EST