[NIFL-ASSESSMENT:763] 2nd-3rd GE plateau for ABE?

From: PHCSJean.2163953@bloglines.com
Date: Tue Nov 23 2004 - 21:04:57 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id iAO24vQ14583; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 21:04:57 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 21:04:57 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <1101261593.413666644.475.sendItem@bloglines.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: PHCSJean.2163953@bloglines.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:763] 2nd-3rd GE plateau for ABE?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain
Status: O
Content-Length: 935
Lines: 25

Hi colleagues.
Last night I was reading an article by a tutor who commented
"People who can't read well consistently test at the second or third grade
level regardless of age or schooling." 

Do you see validity in that? Have
you seen that in your centers? I know as a past elementary teacher that there's
a huge step up in that level. I'm wondering what the barrier could be for
our students if this is indeed the plateau they hit the wall at.

The article
isn't from a scholarly publication, but one I found on a database (maybe even
Google Scholar--check that out if you haven't yet) so I'm not sure who validated
this besides the author, but it does seem to be a plausible hypothesis. I'd
love to know what you think.

The article: McKinney, Martha. At a loss for
words: The desperate world of adult non-readers. ETC. Summer 2001, p 168-171


Thanks!
Jean Marrapodi
Providence Assembly of God Adult Learning Center

Providence, RI



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:46:24 EST