[NIFL-ASSESSMENT:810] RE: Questions about CASAS

From: Gopalakrishnan Ajit (MIDD) (ajit.gopalakrishnan@po.state.ct.us)
Date: Fri Dec 10 2004 - 13:13:57 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id iBAIDvU27456; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:13:57 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:13:57 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <40AE0637F967D5118227000347710D4709DEEB0C@SDECTEX>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Gopalakrishnan Ajit (MIDD)" <ajit.gopalakrishnan@po.state.ct.us>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:810] RE: Questions about CASAS
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Status: O
Content-Length: 7280
Lines: 147

Hello Bonnie, Marie and others,

In my view, competencies and the basic/enabling skills that underlie these
competencies are both included in the CASAS framework. Training sessions
that introduce practitioners to the CASAS framework always get them thinking
about both facets in a variety of ways (e.g. basic skills versus life skills
activities, task detailing and competency prioritizations, curriculum
materials guides, task areas in assessment reports, lesson plan activities,
etc.). I see them as two sides of the same coin. I like Bonnie's reference
to the balanced approach when it comes to working with learners.

CASAS is also in the final stages of formally aligning its
competencies/assessments to adult education content standards. This will
codify what students should know in particular subjects/skills at points
along the instructional pathway. It will make explicit the enabling/basic
skills that students need to know to perform the various competencies.
Connecticut is actively involved in this effort.

Historically speaking, CASAS seems to have begun at a time when it was
important to emphasize that adults learn best in contexts that mean
something to them. I see the "breaking down" of tasks or task detailing that
Bonnie refers to as a natural and probably useful part of the teaching
process. This task detailing process has been a part of our training
sessions and publications over the years and is important to a well rounded
implementation of the CASAS system. I am confident that the content
standards alignment effort will "formally" close the "loop" between
competencies and basic skills and strengthen the CASAS system.

Bonnie also requested my comment on new workplace literacy assessments that
were recently made available through CASAS. Connecticut partially supported
the development of these assessments that assess learners in the context of
the workplace (not employment readiness). The standardized reading, math,
writing and oral assessments that are part of this Workforce Learning System
(WLS) are suitable for learners who are working or have worked recently.

Lastly, I personally feel that CASAS is a consortium of states first, that
also happens to possess terrific expertise in creating systems that
integrate curriculum, assessment, and instruction. In my view, they are not
just a test developer though they are pretty darned good at it. The states
that are part of the consortium work together to set priorities for CASAS,
and actually help in item writing, field-testing, training materials
development, policy formulation, etc.  I believe that almost half, if not
more of the states in union say they use CASAS (exclusively or partially)
and would hope that this discussion can be broadened beyond Connecticut!

Bonnie, it is so good to hear from you. I hope you are doing well.

Regards,
Ajit

Ajit Gopalakrishnan
Education Consultant
Connecticut Department of Education
25 Industrial Park Road
Middletown, CT 06457
Tel: (860) 807-2125
Fax: (860) 807-2062
ajit.gopalakrishnan@po.state.ct.us

-----Original Message-----
From: Bonnie Odiorne [mailto:bonniesophia@adelphia.net] 
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 10:08 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:804] RE: Questions about CASAS

Hi, Marie and Cathy,
I was in adult programs in CT using CASAS for ten years. CASAS has its
limitations. I'm not sure what Cathy means by "parallel forms" for pre-post;
as far as I knew, the pre/post were on the same level and approximately the
same questions, and were criteria- and not norm-referenced. So what was the
issue.
About using CASAS in non-competency programs: at the ABE and lower-level
ESL, there's no such thing as far as I'm concerned. I know the tendency in
reading is toward structured, phonics and multisensory approaches, and in
the literacy organization I was program director of, we used an LVA
assessment that at least broke down phonemes, word patterns, vowel sounds
and the like, however weak it may have been as an assessment tool it was a
good diagnostic tool. But even for reading I'm a firm believer in a balanced
approach, and that phonetic instruction must be combined with language
experience (with its foundations on initial consonant sounds, word patterns,
key words) in addition to putting into writing the student's own words. And
many students even at low reading levels werein dire need of
competency-based lessons for specific contexts, especially daily life skills
and the workplace. As for ESL, CASAS was good at describing level indicator
competencies, but not so great in specifying what language structures,
grammar etc. would be needed at these levels. I found myself in my
employment/technology program doing skills breakdowns of the competencies
myself in order to embed basic skills instruction when needed, and I
shouldn't have had to. CASAS will do curriculum matrices identifying CASAS
competencies taught in texts, but it's difficult at times to teach to the
competency. It's necessary to teach to the underlying skills needed in order
to successfully navigate test items, i.e. the "tasks," and more. I was also
briefly involved (Ajit: you can help out here) in the CT development of a
workplace (not employment readiness) version. I wish it had been around when
I was doing a workplace program, developing literacy audits, curricula and
so forth. Nowadays I am much more interested in a "project-based" assessment
which could include embedded competencies, or the EFF efforts to bring in
assessment tools to its framework, as I see this model as integrating skills
levels and competencies in the complexity of everyday tasks. BTW, I just
finished an ESL employment readiness class at the university where I'm now
teaching for student interns, and am surprised at how similarly I could
structure the course. CASAS competencies would have been useful in that
setting, also.
Best regards,
Bonnie Odiorne

-----Original Message-----
From: nifl-assessment@nifl.gov [mailto:nifl-assessment@nifl.gov]On
Behalf Of Cathy Shank
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 1:04 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:803] RE: Questions about CASAS


We stopped accepting it in WV because there is no parallel form of the test.
The NRS requires that for pre/post assessment you must use two parallel
forms.

Cathy Shank
phone: 304-766-7655 ext. 112 or 1-800-257-3723 ext. 112; fax: 304-766-7915
email: cshank@access.k12.wv.us
-----Original Message-----
From: nifl-assessment@nifl.gov [mailto:nifl-assessment@nifl.gov] On Behalf
Of Debbie Yoho
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 12:43 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:802] RE: Questions about CASAS

Dear Friends:  I need to know, quickly, about the use of the Slosson Oral
Reading Test in programs that get WIA funding.  Are there states who accept
the Slosson as a viable assessment for NRS purposes, and are there any that
have specifically rejected it and do not accept it for NRS purposes?  Many
thanks.

For the Cause!  Debbie

Deborah W. Yoho
Co-moderator, NIFL-Health Listserv
Executive Director, Greater Columbia Literacy Council
Past President, SC Adult Literacy Educators
2728 Devine Street,  Columbia, SC  29205
803-765-2555   Fax  803-799-8417   dwyoho@earthlink.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:46:26 EST