[NIFL-ESL:1355] RV: RV: Desde la otra BABEL para el mundo entero

From: CARLOS DIMEO (dimeo@telcel.net.ve)
Date: Tue Sep 02 1997 - 14:30:42 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost.nifl.gov [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA19105; Tue, 2 Sep 1997 14:30:42 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 1997 14:30:42 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <19970902182735.AAA19347@carlosdi>
Errors-To: lmann@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "CARLOS DIMEO" <dimeo@telcel.net.ve>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-ESL:1355] RV: RV: Desde la otra BABEL para el mundo entero
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1157
Status: RO
Content-Length: 12356
Lines: 222



----------
De: CARLOS DIMEO <dimeo@telcel.net.ve>
A: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Asunto: [NIFL-ESL:1354] RV: Desde la otra BABEL para el mundo entero
Fecha: martes 2 de septiembre de 1997 13:33


This message is write en English and Spanish.
Carlos Dimeo desde la otra BABEL
para el mundo entero.

Good dear friends. This is a hard task. I believe that the moderator is
right in certain part, because of an or another form should work with the
lists.  
For my it is a surprise that can not filter the lists. But we already see
the filters they exist. The limits also exist. I am not against English, it
is something that I get tired of repeating it neither I want to enter in
the spirit of the list, in the arduous work that you/they have had during
two years.  
But as the same moderator she/he has said, the list has grown, the list has
changed and now she/he has other users. This is adjacent with the right of
property, but the property is the property, only until there. As Facundo
Cabral she/he says it: " The conqueror to take care of his conquest becomes
slave that is to say of what conquered, that hoaxing was hoaxed." And in
this sense the pertencia, is not the moderancia. I have found that the
American North is very resistant to Spanish, and I find well that they
defend its language, but I defend mine and I believe in that of the other
ones. And this is only an enough condition, to maintain my language.   
Mrs. Fran Keenan, is not my spirit to fight against you for my it is a
honor to participate in this list. But she/he wants to know you that I
don't speak English, regrettably and I can not say what I really sit down
more than in another language. Then English is not the only reference
language, please don't close you I live in a country of the Third World,
but that is only a Label, because I for anything sit down third mundista,
to what refers me, it is that the things make them one and you can not
fight with this. A native for example has a technology and in there is it a
sophistication, there is a genius, a thought, a form and you/he/she is not
different no more, no less that this. This is a form and the one of she/he
stops the hunt, the fishing, the gathering it is another. The same thing
happens with the language, each lengueje has a form, a condition, and it is
peculiar of each who. I think of Spanish for well or for bad of other, and
you. in English for bad or it stops well of other and 99% of the list also
sure she/he makes it in English or in French, or in another of the 600 to
but languages that there is in the world that he finds. Then the fight is
not against you. It is against the mediatización of the means, the coercion
to the silence, because if I have to express myself with words that are not
mine regrettably this is to be condemned to the silence, let us outline
this as we want to outline it. You tell us that most speaks English. If it
is true because 80% of Internet is in United States that he finds, but
imagine you that it was in in the Republic of Bosnia, or in Cyprus, or in
Madagascar, then that it had happened, there was the world had internet,
the list it would exist. You can not prevail this way. It is not anything
personal. But the information now is more filtered than never. And those
that don't have voice, can not make neither to say anything. I want my
America that not the America an only country, I want my America everything
from the most remote point in the Canada until the deepest end in the
patagonia. In this extension 80% speaks Spanish " thank you " to the
conquest that he finds, I would like to speak my language exactly and that
of the comanche, that of the cherokee, etc. and this is not chauvinismo.  
Apologize you. those of the " list " if me the only Venezuelan that is in
her the I importune. She/he didn't want to leave her, but if you. They
believe that I should please make it tells it to me, but one is not able to
perdir that one abandons completely everything.  
>From this bastion and in the fight against BABEL, the revolutions in the
almost XXI century they are different, I won't take the house of the
ambassadors like they made it those of the MRTA, they remember it in Peru,
but the moderator, that is to say FUJIMORI, killed them to mansalva,
because they didn't want to speak the same language, good that the
elementary principle of any war. I don't want to war, I want to speak, to
alphabetize, to educate, to write. I want that we can resist BABEL, I want
us to exchange that it is the village globar of McLuhan, but that it is
truly the global village that this doesn't become 1984 of ORWEL they
remember it, they remember when Richard Burton interpreted this character.
Srs. from this bastion I will continue not combatting for my language but
for the plurilingüilidad, for the multiple language, not for Esperanto.
Although some seem them late, chauvisnista or of the third world I won't
change position at least for the time being.  
  
For the whole world  
Carlos Dimeo  
dimeo@telcel.net.ve 
telf +58-43-339441  
fax +58-43-339441


Bueno estimados amigos. Esto es una tarea dura. Yo creo que el moderador
tiene razon en cierta parte, porque de una u otra forma debe trabajar con
las listas.  
Para mi es una sorpresa que no pueda filtrar las listas. Pero ya vemos los
filtros existen. Los limites tambien existen. Yo no estoy en contra del
ingles, es algo que me canso de repetirlo ni quiero irrumpir en el animo de
la lista, en el arduo trabajo que han tenido durante dos años.  
Pero como el mismo moderador ha dicho, la lista ha crecido, la lista ha
cambiado y ahora tiene otros usuarios. Esto colinda con el derecho de
propiedad, pero la propiedad es la propiedad, solo hasta alli. Como lo dice
Facundo Cabral: " El conquistador por cuidar su conquista se transforma en
esclavo de lo que conquisto, es decir que embromando se embromo ". Y en
este sentido la pertencia, no es la moderancia. He encontrado que el Norte
Americano es muy resistente al Español, y me parece bien que defiendan su
idioma, pero yo defiendo el mio y creo en lo de los otros. Y esto es solo
una condicion suficiente, para mantener mi lenguaje.   
Sr. Fran Keenan, no es mi animo luchar contra Ud. para mi es un honor
participar en esta lista. Pero quiere saber Ud. que yo no hablo ingles,
lamentablemente y no puedo decir lo que de verdad siento mas que en otro
idioma. Entonces el Ingles no es la unica lengua de referencia, por favor
no se cierre Ud. Yo vivo en un pais del Tercer Mundo, pero eso es solo una
Etiqueta, porque yo para nada me siento tercer mundista, a lo que me
refiero, es que las cosas las hace uno y no se puede luchar con esto. Un
indigena por ejemplo tiene una tecnologia y en ello hay una sofisticacion,
hay un ingenio, un pensamiento, una forma y no es distinta ni mas ni menos
que esta. Esta es una forma y la de ellos para la caza, la pesca, la
recoleccion es otra. Lo mismo ocurre con el lenguaje, cada lenguaje tiene
una forma, una condicion, y es particular de cada quien. Yo pienso en
Español para bien o para mal de otros, y ud. en ingles para mal o para bien
de otros y el 99% de la lista tambien seguro lo hace en ingles o en
frances, o en otro de los 600 o mas lenguas que hay en el mundo que le
parece. Entonces la lucha no es contra ud. Es contra la mediatizacion de
los medios, la coaccion al silencio, porque si yo tengo que expresarme con
palabras que no son mias lamentablemente esto es condenarse al silencio,
planteemos esto como lo queramos plantear. Ud nos dice que la mayoria habla
ingles. Si es verdad porque el 80% de Internet esta en Estados Unidos, que
le parece, pero imaginese Ud. que estuviera en en la Republica de Bosnia, o
en Chipre, o en Madagascar, entonces que hubiera pasado, hubiera el mundo
tenido internet, la lista existiria. No se puede predominar de esta manera.
No es nada personal. Pero la informacion ahora esta más filtrada que nunca.
Y aquellos que no tienen voz, no pueden hacer ni decir nada. Yo quiero mi
America, que no la America un solo pais, yo quiero mi America toda desde el
punto mas remoto del Canada hasta el extremo mas profundo de la patagonia.
En esta  extension el 80% hablamos Español " gracias " a la conquista que
le parece, me gustaria hablar exactamente mi idioma y el de los comanche,
el de los cherokee, etc. y esto no es chauvinismo.  
Disculpenme uds. los de la  " lista " si yo el unico venezolano que en ella
esta los importuno. No quisiera salir de ella, pero si uds. Creen que debo
hacerlo por favor diganmelo, pero no se puede perdir que uno abandone por
completo todo.  
Desde este bastion y en la lucha contra BABEL, las revoluciones en el casi
siglo XXI son distintas, yo no tomare las casa de los embajadores como lo
hicieron los del MRTA, lo recuerdan en Peru, pero el moderador, es decir
FUJIMORI, los mato a mansalva, porque no querian hablar el mismo idioma,
bueno ese el principio elemental de cualquier guerra. Yo no quiero
guerrear, yo quiero hablar, alfabetizar, educar, escribir. Yo quiero que
podamos resistir a BABEL, yo quiero que intercambiemos, que sea la aldea
globar de McLuhan, pero que verdaderamente sea la aldea global, que esto no
se convierta en 1984 de ORWEL lo recuerdan, recuerdan cuando Richard Burton
interpreto este personaje. Srs. desde este bastion seguire combatiendo no
por mi idioma sino por la plurilinguilidad, por el multiple idioma, no por
el esperanto. Aunque algunos les parezca atrasado,  chauvisnista o del
tercer mundo yo no cambiare de posicion al menos por ahora.  
  
Para el mundo entero  
Carlos Dimeo  
dimeo@telcel.net.ve  
telf +58-43-339441  
fax +58-43-339441

----------
> De: Fran Keenan <fran@cal.org>
> A: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
> Asunto: [NIFL-ESL:1353] Moderator's note
> Fecha: martes 2 de septiembre de 1997 12:27
> 
> What I realize from all of the heated back and forth on the issue of
> Spanish (or other language) use on this list is that the list itself
> has grown and changed considerably over the past two and a half
> years. We now have almost 400 subscribers (double what we had one
> year ago), who do not, for the most part, know each other. The list
> has "a life of its own" which is really a good thing for the most
> part. It is much more lively. However, as it grows, it changes its
> nature. It is personal but impersonal, cozy but anonymous. What is it
> like?  a classroom? a collective? a town meeting?  a publication? a
> telemarketing call? a living room? Why are we all subscribed? Do we
> expect the same things, surely not. 
> 
> The job of moderator has changed from being sort of a list
> cheerleader (please somebody, post something) to the harder one of
> trying to keep a focus in the midst of an increasing volume of
> postings. An e-mail list is not by nature a very orderly thing, which
> is part of the charm and part of the difficulty of "moderating" one.
> Nonetheless, it is my role to suggest ways in which this list can
> function more smoothly. My suggestions last week were that:
> 
> 1. personal messages not get posted to the list (***the main
> point!***)
> 
> and  that...
> 
> 2. postings be made in English so that the greatest number of
> subscribers (indeed, if not all subscribers) can understand them.
> 
> Obviously there are benefits and joys and inherent rights to
> communication in all languages. My thinking was that it was to the
> benefit of this forum that we limit ourselves to communication in
> English. (Yes, limit ourselves). It is a convention, not a mindset.
> 
> Point of clarification: This was not a government pronouncement (I
> don't work for any government). It's my personal suggestion as
> moderator of this list.
> 
> On a truly moderated list, where all messages funnel through the
> moderator's e-mail box before being posted, a moderator has the
> ability (some would say duty) to filter out irrelevant, rude, or
> obscene mail. I do not have that ability and this list will continue
> to be self governed for netiquette violations. 
> 
> Thanks for the notes of support but let's get the focus off whether I
> was personally maligned and back onto the business of the list
> 
> --sharing information about language and literacy education for
> adults in the United States.
> 
> 
> 
> Fran Keenan
> NIFL-ESL moderator
> 
> 
> 
> 
----------



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Apr 14 2005 - 14:09:37 EDT