Return-Path: <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost.nifl.gov [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA06949; Fri, 7 Nov 1997 23:19:10 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 1997 23:19:10 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <19971107.194400.4919.1.paul168@juno.com>
Errors-To: lmann@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: paul168@juno.com (Grupo Primavera)
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-ESL:1473] The issue of English Only
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Juno 1.38
Status: RO
Content-Length: 589
Lines: 11
There is throughout this country a "movement" to establish English
as the official language and to institute English Only instruction in
elementary schools.
I personally am very opposed to this "movement" and would like to
know the opinions of others, especially of those who can offer solid
arguments destroying the so called "research" touting English Immersion.
On the other hand, research on Dual Language or Two Way Immersion
programs indicates that such an approach is vastly superior to all
others. And I would like to hear from people on this program.
Paul Rogers
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Apr 14 2005 - 14:09:40 EDT