[NIFL-ESL:1474] Re: California's English Only Initiative

From: Susan Gaer (sgaer@otan.dni.us)
Date: Sat Nov 08 1997 - 00:57:41 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost.nifl.gov [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA07977; Sat, 8 Nov 1997 00:57:41 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 1997 00:57:41 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <fc.004c56fb00341bc23b9aca0013ee5a54.341bc3@otan.dni.us>
Errors-To: lmann@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: sgaer@otan.dni.us (Susan Gaer)
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-ESL:1474] Re: California's English Only Initiative
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
Content-Length: 12246
Lines: 303

If you are interested in CATESOL stand on the UNZ initiative, please visit
our web site at:
http://www.catesol.org/unz.html



paul168@juno.com,Internet writes:
>
>             As it will appear on the June, 1998 California Ballot
>
>
>                                The Unz Initiative
>                       by Ron K. Unz and Gloria Matta Tuchman
>  Text: 
>
>  SECTION 1. Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 300) is added to Part 1
>of the Educational 
>  Code, to read: 
>
>  CHAPTER 3. ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN 
>
>  ARTICLE 1. Findings and Declarations 
>
>  300. The People of California find and declare as follows: 
>
>  (a) WHEREAS the English language is the national public language of the
>United States of 
>  America and of the state of California, is spoken by the vast majority
>of California residents, and 
>  is also the leading world language for science, technology, and
>international business, thereby 
>  being the language of economic opportunity; and 
>
>  (b) WHEREAS immigrant parents are eager to have their children acquire
>a good knowledge of 
>  English, thereby allowing them to fully participate in the American
>Dream of economic and social 
>  advancement; and 
>
>  (c) WHEREAS the government and the public schools of California have a
>moral obligation and 
>  a constitutional duty to provide all of CaliforniaIs children,
>regardless of their ethnicity or national 
>  origins, with the skills necessary to become productive members of our
>society, and of these 
>  skills, literacy in the English language is among the most important;
>and 
>
>  (d) WHEREAS the public schools of California currently do a poor job of
>educating immigrant 
>  children, wasting financial resources on costly experimental language
>programs whose failure 
>  over the past two decades is demonstrated by the current high drop-out
>rates and low English 
>  literacy levels of many immigrant children; and 
>
>  (e) WHEREAS young immigrant children can easily acquire full fluency in
>a new language, such 
>  as English, if they are heavily exposed to that language in the
>classroom at an early age. 
>
>  (f) THEREFORE it is resolved that: all children in California public
>schools shall be taught English 
>  as rapidly and effectively as possible. 
>
>  ARTICLE 2. English Language Education 
>
>  305. Subject to the exceptions provided in Article 3 (commencing with
>Section 310), all children 
>  in California public schools shall be taught English by being taught in
>English. In particular, this 
>  shall require that all children be placed in English language
>classrooms. Children who are English 
>  learners shall be educated through sheltered English immersion during a
>temporary transition 
>  period not normally intended to exceed one year. Local schools shall be
>permitted to place in the 
>  same classroom English learners of different ages but whose degree of
>English proficiency is 
>  similar. Local schools shall be encouraged to mix together in the same
>classroom English learners 
>  from different native-language groups but with the same degree of
>English fluency. Once English 
>  learners have acquired a good working knowledge of English, they shall
>be transferred to English 
>  language mainstream classrooms. As much as possible, current
>supplemental funding for English 
>  learners shall be maintained, subject to possible modification under
>Article 8 (commencing with 
>  Section 335) below. 
>
>  306. The definitions of the terms used in this article and in Article 3
>(commencing with Section 
>  310) are as follows: 
>
>  (a) "English learner" means a child who does not speak English or whose
>native language is not 
>  English and who is not currently able to perform ordinary classroom
>work in English, also known 
>  as a Limited English Proficiency or LEP child. 
>
>  (b) "English language classroom" means a classroom in which the
>language of instruction used by 
>  the teaching personnel is overwhelmingly the English language, and in
>which such teaching 
>  personnel possess a good knowledge of the English language. 
>
>  (c) "English language mainstream classroom" means a classroom in which
>the students either are 
>  native English language speakers or already have acquired reasonable
>fluency in English. 
>
>  (d) "Sheltered English immersion" or "structured English immersion"
>means an English language 
>  acquisition process for young children in which nearly all classroom
>instruction is in English but 
>  with the curriculum and presentation designed for children who are
>learning the language. 
>
>  (e) "Bilingual education/native language instruction" means a language
>acquisition process for 
>  students in which much or all instruction, textbooks, and teaching
>materials are in the childIs 
>  native language. 
>
>  ARTICLE 3. Parental Exceptions 
>
>  310. The requirements of Section 305 may be waived with the prior
>written informed consent, to 
>  be provided annually, of the childIs parents or legal guardian under
>the circumstances specified 
>  below and in Section 311. Such informed consent shall require that said
>parents or legal guardian 
>  personally visit the school to apply for the waiver and that they there
>be provided a full 
>  description of the educational materials to be used in the different
>educational program choices 
>  and all the educational opportunities available to the child. Under
>such parental waiver 
>  conditions, children may be transferred to classes where they are
>taught English and other 
>  subjects through bilingual education techniques or other generally
>recognized educational 
>  methodologies permitted by law. Individual schools in which 20 students
>or more of a given 
>  grade level receive a waiver shall be required to offer such a class;
>otherwise, they must allow the 
>  students to transfer to a public school in which such a class is
>offered. 
>
>  311. The circumstances in which a parental exception waiver may be
>granted under Section 310 
>  are as follows: 
>
>  (a) Children who already know English: the child already possesses good
>English language skills, 
>  as measured by standardized tests of English vocabulary comprehension,
>reading, and writing, in 
>  which the child scores at or above the state average for his grade
>level or at or above the 5th 
>  grade average, whichever is lower; or 
>  
>  (b) Older children: the child is age 10 years or older, and it is the
>informed belief of the school 
>  principal and educational staff that an alternate course of educational
>study would be better 
>  suited to the childIs rapid acquisition of basic English language
>skills; or 
>
>  (c) Children with special needs: the child already has been placed for
>a period of not less than 
>  thirty days during that school year in an English language classroom
>and it is subsequently the 
>  informed belief of the school principal and educational staff that the
>child has such special 
>  physical, emotional, psychological, or educational needs that an
>alternate course of educational 
>  study would be better suited to the childIs overall educational
>development. A written description 
>  of these special needs must be provided and any such decision is to be
>made subject to the 
>  examination and approval of the local school superintendent, under
>guidelines established by and 
>  subject to the review of the local Board of Education and ultimately
>the State Board of 
>  Education. The existence of such special needs shall not compel
>issuance of a waiver, and the 
>  parents shall be fully informed of their right to refuse to agree to a
>waiver. 
>  
>   ARTICLE 4. Community-Based English Tutoring 
>
>  315. In furtherance of its constitutional and legal requirement to
>offer special language assistance 
>  to children coming from backgrounds of limited English proficiency, the
>state shall encourage 
>  family members and others to provide personal English language tutoring
>to such children, and 
>  support these efforts by raising the general level of English language
>knowledge in the community. 
>  Commencing with the fiscal year in which this initiative is enacted and
>for each of the nine fiscal 
>  years following thereafter, a sum of fifty million dollars
>($50,000,000) per year is hereby 
>  appropriated from the General Fund for the purpose of providing
>additional funding for free or 
>  subsidized programs of adult English language instruction to parents or
>other members of the 
>  community who pledge to provide personal English language tutoring to
>California school 
>  children with limited English proficiency. 
>
>  316. Programs funded pursuant to this section shall be provided through
>schools or community 
>  organizations. Funding for these programs shall be administered by the
>Office of the 
>  Superintendent of Public Instruction, and shall be disbursed at the
>discretion of the local school 
>  boards, under reasonable guidelines established by, and subject to the
>review of, the State Board 
>  of Education. 
>
>  ARTICLE 5. Legal Standing and Parental Enforcement 
>
>  320. As detailed in Article 2 (commencing with Section 305) and Article
>3 (commencing with 
>  Section 310), all California school children have the right to be
>provided with an English language 
>  public education. If a California school child has been denied the
>option of an English language 
>  instructional curriculum in public school, the childIs parent or legal
>guardian shall have legal 
>  standing to sue for enforcement of the provisions of this statute, and
>if successful shall be 
>  awarded normal and customary attorneyIs fees and actual damages, but
>not punitive or 
>  consequential damages. Any school board member or other elected
>official or public school 
>  teacher or administrator who willfully and repeatedly refuses to
>implement the terms of this 
>  statute by providing such an English language educational option at an
>available public school to a 
>  California school child may be held personally liable for fees and
>actual damages by the childIs 
>  parents or legal guardian. 
>
>  ARTICLE 6. Severability 
>
>  325. If any part or parts of this statute are found to be in conflict
>with federal law or the United 
>  States or the California State Constitution, the statute shall be
>implemented to the maximum 
>  extent that federal law, and the United States and the California State
>Constitution permit. Any 
>  provision held invalid shall be severed from the remaining portions of
>this statute. 
>
>  ARTICLE 7. Operative Date 
>
>  330. This initiative shall become operative for all school terms which
>begin more than sixty days 
>  following the date at which it becomes effective. 
>
>  ARTICLE 8. Amendment. 
>
>  335. The provisions of this act may be amended by a statute that
>becomes effective upon 
>  approval by the electorate or by a statute to further the actIs purpose
>passed by a two-thirds 
>  vote of each house of the Legislature and signed by the Governor. 
>
>  ARTICLE 9. Interpretation 
>
>       340. Under circumstances in which portions of this statute are
>subject to conflicting 
>    interpretations, Section 300 shall be assumed to contain the
>governing intent of the statute. 
>
>
>                     
>
>
>--- Internet Message Header Follows ---
>Received: from literacy.nifl.gov (192.188.111.2)
>	by otan.dni.us (FirstClass Mail Server v1.0)
>	transient id 462; 9:26:35 PM -0800
>Received: from literacy (localhost.nifl.gov [127.0.0.1])
>	by literacy.nifl.gov (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA06825;
>	Fri, 7 Nov 1997 23:17:27 -0500 (EST)
>Date: Fri, 7 Nov 1997 23:17:27 -0500 (EST)
>Message-Id: <19971107.201613.8031.0.paul168@juno.com>
>Errors-To: lmann@literacy.nifl.gov
>Reply-To: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
>Originator: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
>Sender: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
>Precedence: bulk
>From: paul168@juno.com (Grupo Primavera)
>To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
>Subject: [NIFL-ESL:1472] California's English Only Initiative
>X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
>X-Mailer: Juno 1.38



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Apr 14 2005 - 14:09:40 EDT