[NIFL-ESL:1501] English only

From: Claire R. Russell (crussell@ccil.org)
Date: Wed Nov 12 1997 - 11:51:39 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost.nifl.gov [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA16984; Wed, 12 Nov 1997 11:51:39 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 11:51:39 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <Pine.BSI.3.96.971111110205.21511B-100000@locke.ccil.org>
Errors-To: lmann@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Claire R. Russell" <crussell@ccil.org>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-ESL:1501] English only
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
Content-Length: 3521
Lines: 62


I've been reading the English only discussion with great interest.  I have
a couple comments to make:

First, as someone who has learned a second language the hard way (ie,
after the young age when my brain was a sponge for it) I can tell you that
I wish I'd been taught a second language from day one.  If my children are
not exposed to intensive bilingual efforts in school, I'll do it myself at
home because I know how important knowing several languages is!  Aside
from the debate about educating non-native English speakers in their first
language, it merely makes sense that all children learn a second, third
and sixth language in this ever smaller world and ever competitive world
economy.  Those who say it costs too much would be wise to look at what it
will cost the U.S. economy in future generations.  I know someone else
said it, but I feel the need to say it again.

Secondly, and I feel even more importantly:  apart from the very valid
discussions about cultural and linguistic identity, etc. inherent in any
English-only debate, I have to mention one other thing that I see day
after day in the school districts in our area, which have a high number of
Spanish-speaking immigrants.  The students are taught through an immersion
process with pull-out ESL support instruction.  The problem is that even
those children who enter English -speaking classes at a young age fall
very far behind in their classroom content areas (math, social studies,  
science, etc.) while still acquiring basic English, so by the time they
reach English proficiency, they are often years behind their classmates in
the content skills they need.  Then these perfectly normal, often highly
intelligent children are labeled as slow, unmotivated, difficult, you
name it.  More often than even I want to think about, they're
inappropriately placed in special ed programs.  And school officials
wonder why the drop-out rate amongst the Latino population in this area is
75%.  These very unmotivated, slow, difficult students who were set up to
fail from the start then show up in my Spanish GED program while working
full-time jobs.

Those who worry about "lazy" immigrants coming to leech off the welfare
state are setting up exactly that for future generations by precluding
non-native English speakers from having a good chance of making it in
school.  A system which allows only the exceptional to succeed sets up
dire future consequences. We all know that people without English
skills and a decent education are far more likely to rely on the social
services net.  The immigrant or first-generation American children who are
not receiving the tools they need to make it are far more likely, in this
or future generations,to become less productive and/or trapped in
low-skill labor and oppressive poverty, whether the government assists
them or not.  Beating down hard working immigrants is not the way to make
our own country great, and programs which do not allow students the
opportunity to really succeed are failing all of us, whether or not we
believe in English-only.

One final note in the hopes I will not be misunderstood:  I'm not
implying that there is some broad-ranging conspiracy to deprive non-native
English speaking students of a quality education.  What I am saying is
that the schools are responsible for ensuring that students are given the
environment and support services to succeed.  Every child deserves that,
no matter their origin, race or native language.

Claire Russell 
La Comunidad Hispana



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Apr 14 2005 - 14:09:42 EDT