[NIFL-ESL:2675] Re: $ 7 million

From: Gayle Sweeney (gsweene@den.k12.de.us)
Date: Tue Dec 01 1998 - 14:25:28 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.9.0.Beta5/8.9.0.Beta5/980425bjb) with SMTP id OAA08278; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 14:25:28 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 14:25:28 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <36640BD4.19319F9F@den.k12.de.us>
Errors-To: lmann@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: Gayle Sweeney <gsweene@den.k12.de.us>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-ESL:2675] Re: $ 7 million
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; x-mac-creator=4D4F5353; x-mac-type=54455854;
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 (Macintosh; I; PPC)

One of the major concerns and issues we are dealing with in Adult
Education ESL programs is acquisition of an appropriate, standardized
placement and progress assessment instrument designed for adult students
at literacy, beginning ESL, intermediate and advanced ESL levels which
is efficient to administer.

We need a placement tool which can be used quickly and effectively in
programs which are open entry and have students entering at many
different times while instruction is underway.  The progress instrument
must also be given at many different times depending on how many hours
of instruction the student has received, so it must also be easy to
administer and not require the instructor's extended time away from
others who are not testing.

>From research I have done on existing standardized ESL assessment
instruments and communication with this listserv, it appears that there
is a dearth of appropriate tools from which to choose.  The US
Department of Education could assist us by developing a user friendly
adult ESL assessment instrument designed for open entry programs.

Thanks for the opportunity to voice a suggestion before funding
decisions are made.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 11 2000 - 13:27:26 EST