Return-Path: <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.9.0.Beta5/8.9.0.Beta5/980425bjb) with SMTP id FAA00589; Fri, 4 Dec 1998 05:37:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 05:37:15 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <fc.002dc802008a5e8c3b9aca0096cf96c0.8a5e93@onf.com> Errors-To: lmann@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: Rob_Wood@onf.com (Rob Wood) To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-ESL:2704] Re: Adult ESL, EFL , and specialized ESL programs X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 dawn_griffiths@cpcc.cc.nc.us writes: > >The question is where the cut off should occur for students in Adult ESL. > Should we have a cut off level, perhaps after intermediate, where >those in the free program enter the "for fee" programs, whether academic >or self-supporting? In Portland Maine we do it at the advanced level when we start adding the specialty courses such as pronounciation, TOEFL PREP, and Reading and Writing. This still does not solve the problem of having too large classes because we accept recent arrivals immidiately and some long time learners are still occupying some of those entry level classroom chairs. Good luck Rob Wood Portland Maine
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 11 2000 - 13:27:27 EST