[NIFL-ESL:4883] Re: NY Times article on Bilingual Education

From: Marguerite Lukes (mlukes@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Wed Aug 23 2000 - 10:32:49 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id e7NEWn826176; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 10:32:49 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 10:32:49 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <39A3DE6F.6E48BA9@ix.netcom.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: Marguerite Lukes <mlukes@ix.netcom.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-ESL:4883] Re: NY Times article on Bilingual Education
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I)
Status: O
Content-Length: 3206
Lines: 89

I was appalled by the Sunday article in the Times.  It was yet another
example of biased education
reporting, in which the important facts of the article were hidden
between the lines.  Most readers
have no background in this area and assume that sink-or-swim is the best
method (It "worked" for
grandma, right?).  The myths about bilingual education, and education
for language minority student
in general, are further propagated by the information in the article.

What proponents of  bilingual education have always stressed is the need
to view language as a
resource and build upon the linguistic strengths of language minority
students.  The fact that after
several years in California schools, native speakers of Spanish have
completely lost their first
language (not only a cultural resource, but an economic resource for
this country), is a sadly telling
example of how bilingual education can be misunderstood.  Later in life
California residents can
spend their tax dollars to re-teach these students a much-needed second
language so they can
compete in the global economy.

California schools have never really had what professionals in the field
of education and
language teaching would consider bilingual education.  Most language
minority students in the
California receive English-as-a-Second-Language (ESL) instruction and no
services in their primary
language. They call this "bilingual education." Others (a very few)
receive some kind of support in
their native language to help aid their transition into English and to
help them learn critical academic
content.  They call this "bilingual education" too.

A lucky few are enrolled in "dual immersion" programs (along with their
native-English speaking
peers) to foster development of two languages.  Dual immersion programs
bring together academic
content instruction while teaching students a second language. Thus
English speakers become
bilingual and biliterate in English and Spanish, alongside their
Spanish-speaking peers, who also
leave these programs with oral proficiency and literacy skills in both
English and Spanish. Steinberg
leaves readers with the extremely erroneous impression that most
Spanish-speaking students in
California schools attended such dual immersion programs, when in fact
this was never the case.

Proposition 227 in California has done away with important primary
language support services,
which are vital for students faced with learning complex academic
content.  Eradicating good
programs in the name of “education” is a misguided crusade.

--
Marguerite Lukes, Director
New York City Professional Development Consortium
84 William Street, 14th floor
New York, NY 10038
Ph: 212.803.3322
Fax: 212.785.3685
e-mail: nycpdc@lacnyc.org
http://www.lacnyc.org/pdc



joann m boss wrote:

> Hi,
> Did anyone read the NY Times article on bilingual education, Sunday,
> August 20? What are your thoughts?
> It seems to me that Oceanside is trying to put a nail in a coffin.
>
> JoAnn Boss

--
Marguerite Lukes, Director
New York City Professional Development Consortium
84 William Street, 14th floor
New York, NY 10038
Ph: 212.803.3322
Fax: 212.785.3685
e-mail: nycpdc@lacnyc.org
http://www.lacnyc.org/pdc



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:45:05 EST