Return-Path: <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id eAR04Z922812; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 19:04:35 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 19:04:35 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <F1137rjcxtniFKULPEh000047bb@hotmail.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: "sam s" <sam2233@hotmail.com> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-ESL:5329] Inetrnet in ESL Composition X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Status: O Content-Length: 670 Lines: 16 Hello there, I have a pedagogical question about which I am so eager to know your opinions. How would you rank the following Internet software programs in teaching ESL/EFL compositions: 1.email, 2. WWW,3. electronic discussions(MOO), and why? In other words, which of the above three software programs would use the most and which would you use the least and WHY? I'd appreciate having as many answers as possible, and, please, just let me know if you are an EFL or ESL instructor. Thanks a lot, Sam _____________________________________________________________________________________ Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:45:14 EST