Return-Path: <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id fAQF45018856; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 10:04:05 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 10:04:05 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <53D73AD721DAD511B7CB0090278617121C0356@EXCHANGEDC> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: Lorry Shoniber <LShoniber@usd259.net> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-ESL:6757] Re: Classroom teacher X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Type: text/plain; X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Status: O Content-Length: 1030 Lines: 33 I shared this string with my program supervisor, Margaret Harris, and this was her response. Since I am not a member of this Listserv (I guess I should subscribe) would you please pass along my comments? I don't think such a person should be promoted to a higher level! Do we want such a person making policy decisions? Although teachers have the direct contact, administrators can do the most damage by not making/supporting policy that guarantees student success in his/her program. Using the Peter principal--promoting someone to his/her level on incompetence is not the solution! Removing that person entirely from the program is the only logical solution. Thank you. Margaret Harris Supervisor, Adult Basic Education Dunbar Campus - 923 N. Cleveland Wichita, Kansas 67214 316-973-3150/ Fax 316-973-3160 Lorry Shoniber 923 Cleveland Wichita, KS 67214 316.973.3163 Yes. Fire the teacher. If you cannot do that, move the teacher to the highest level so that he/she will do the least damage. Kathleen Bombach
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:31:01 EST